W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Yet another RDFa experience

From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:18:20 +0200
Message-ID: <52bd7c3d0709251518x1c5b990dx4d57fb0d3c1ee8fb@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>, "Fabien Gandon" <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>

 > If I understand the problem properly, there is very little that can be
> done here from our point of view. Indeed, afaik, the RSS specification
> uses a _restricted_ version of RDF/XML. I think that the fact that my
> distiller produces something acceptable by the RSS validators is, though
> flattering:-), just a pure coincidence.

Good coicidence :-) and yes, this is the problem. I hope there are few
cases with same issue. I'll continue testing on others things to find.

> tomorrow, I would upgrade the underlying RDFLib package which would
> produce a slightly different RDF/XML serialization (though identical in
> the RDF sense) that would not pass an RSS validator any more.Ie, I
> think Fabien is right that this is not possible with a generic
> extractor/distiller/parser. :-(

Thanks for reply, Ivan.



> Ivan
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2007 22:18:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:52 UTC