> If I understand the problem properly, there is very little that can be > done here from our point of view. Indeed, afaik, the RSS specification > uses a _restricted_ version of RDF/XML. I think that the fact that my > distiller produces something acceptable by the RSS validators is, though > flattering:-), just a pure coincidence. Good coicidence :-) and yes, this is the problem. I hope there are few cases with same issue. I'll continue testing on others things to find. > tomorrow, I would upgrade the underlying RDFLib package which would > produce a slightly different RDF/XML serialization (though identical in > the RDF sense) that would not pass an RSS validator any more.Ie, I > think Fabien is right that this is not possible with a generic > extractor/distiller/parser. :-( Thanks for reply, Ivan. Cheers, Simone > Ivan >Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2007 22:18:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:52 UTC