Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues

Shane McCarron wrote:
> 
> The following issues were raised during the brief review period:
> 
>   1. There is no section on conformance.  We must have one of these.
>   2. Manu mentioned that xml:base should work.  I think we resolved
>      that it cannot.  Can someone confirm that?
>   3. SAX Processing - is there a formal reference for the definition of
>      that somewhere?
>   4. What datatypes are allowed to be specified?
>   5. What is the definition of canonicalization in the context of RDFa?
>   6. What should happen if there is no prefix on an attribute value
>      that takes a CURIE?
> 

7. Finalize the @instanceof behaviour
8. Decision on whether we use @lang or not

Ivan

> That's all I have seen to date.
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf