Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues

Shane McCarron wrote:
> 
>   2. Manu mentioned that xml:base should work.  I think we resolved
>      that it cannot.  Can someone confirm that?

xml:base does not affect the links in @href in XHTML1.1, and browsers
behave accordingly (they ignore xml:base), so we can't override that
with RDFa. We certainly can't say that xml:base affects @about but
somehow not @href.

>   6. What should happen if there is no prefix on an attribute value
>      that takes a CURIE?

Since the @rel situation makes it too complicated to accept prefix-less
values, we probably shouldn't take them into account in XHTML1.1+RDFa.

-Ben