Ivan Herman a écrit : > Simone Onofri wrote: > >> > If I understand the problem properly, there is very little that can be >> >>> done here from our point of view. Indeed, afaik, the RSS specification >>> uses a _restricted_ version of RDF/XML. I think that the fact that my >>> distiller produces something acceptable by the RSS validators is, though >>> flattering:-), just a pure coincidence. >>> >> Good coicidence :-) and yes, this is the problem. I hope there are few >> cases with same issue. I'll continue testing on others things to find. >> >> > > Well, this is an issue of RSS:-( Put it another way, RSS is _not_ a good > use case for RDFa:-( It is a good example for GRDDL because a > specialized GRDDL transform for RSS has an exact control over the output > format. My 2 cents: it is a good scenario for cascading transforms: (Transform 1) RDFa -> RDF/XML (Transform 2) RDF/XML -> RDF/XML RSS restriction Cheers, -- Fabien - http://ns.inria.fr/fabien.gandon/
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 08:55:44 UTC