ACTION-70 More use cases for punning
[meta] When and for what to use IRC in telecons?
- Re: [meta] When and for what to use IRC in telecons?
- Re: [meta] When and for what to use IRC in telecons?
Conformance level example
Professional and constructive working practices
Request for Comments: SKOS Reference: W3C Working Draft 25 January 2008
Action-73 Description of UML Association Class and how it may relate to Class/ObjectProperty punning
Reminder: Imports TF meeting Monday Feb 4, 10 AM EST
publicity page
my personal reply to (Re: comments on RIF BLD from OWL WG)
Re: comments on RIF BLD from OWL WG
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 30th, 2008
DatatypeRestriction in semantics WD allows only one facet. A bug?
Fragments discussion
UFDTF minutes for 28 Jan 2008
FYI: SKOS Reference has just been published
Where is the forbidden RDF vocabulary?
[UFDTF] My action to compare documents - a starting point for discussion tomorrow
Pointers to the WG Note Drafts?
Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability)
Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review
- RE: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review
Useful deprecation
Evidence for use of deprecated language
Use cases for punning
question about annotations
proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation)
- Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation)
- Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation)
identifying yourself on telecons
bnode skolemization during parsing?
nonmon mapping and punning
Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability)
ISSUE-90 and ISSUE-91 backwards compatibility of versioning information: possible fixes
URI's in syntax document
Imports task force
Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users
- Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users
- Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users
- Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008
- Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008
- Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008
Punning discussion
- Re: Punning discussion
- Re: Punning discussion
- Re: Punning discussion
- RE: Punning discussion
- RE: Punning discussion
ISSUE-29: Situation of owl:DataRange in OWL-Full
UFDTF meeting pushed to next week for lack of quorum
Primer review, part 2: Basic Notions
Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections
- Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections
- Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections
- Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections
- A comment on the Primer draft, part 1 Introduction
Reminder: UFDTF TC Monday January 21, 2008
[UFDTF] Regrets for Monday, Jan 21
possible regrets for UFDTF TC 21 Jan
ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
Minutes Jan 16...
ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- RE: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- RE: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- RE: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
- Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back
ACTION-61 (F2F minutes link fix up) complete and two points
ISSUE-29 datarange and plain literals with language tags
About DENY proposal: ISSUE-73 infinite universe
About "deprecation" of 'owl:DataRange'
Universal Property
- Re: Universal Property
- Re: Universal Property
- Re: Universal Property
- Re: Universal Property
- Re: Universal Property
- Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- RE: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73
- Re: Universal Property
- Re: Universal Property
- Re: Universal Property
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property)
- Re: Universal Property
No facets mentioned in the RDF mapping document
Re: Turtle
call for papers for OWLED 2008 DC (papers due 15 February)
ISSUE-93 (Language tags): RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages
- Re: ISSUE-93 (Language tags): RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages
Proposal to close (as POSTPONED) Issue 8
QCRs
Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping
- Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping
- RE: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping
ISSUE-16 (entity annotations)
Re: Introductions
- Re: Introductions
[UFDTF] Deb and Evan's outline proposal
Agenda amendment re: ISSUE-92, ISSUE-91, and ISSUE-90
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008
- Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008
- Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008
- possible agenda amendment Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008
Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- Re: skolems: visible differences?
- FW: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: FW: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Re: Proposal and Test cases
- Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
- Evidence of user attitudes toward BNodes (was Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?))
- Re: Evidence of user attitudes toward BNodes (was Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?))
- RE: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)
Choosing a time for a meeting of the imports task force
[UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST
- Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST
- Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST
- Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST
EasyKeys proposal
Proposal to close ISSUE-83 and ISSUE-8
Proposal to close ISSUE-69
help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER)
xsd facets proposal
My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29)
- Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29)
- Proposal to close ISSUE-73 (was Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29))
Minutes of 2008-01-09 telecon
Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)
- Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)
- Two small corrections (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65))
- Specifically on ISSUE-65 (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65))
Publicising FPWDs
POWDER/OWL update
Test process
published
Reviewing minutes of Manchester F2F
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 9th, 2008
PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 as postponed
Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-83 (ACTION-51)
ACTION-38
ISSUE-15: Ontologies should not be required to include a URI
converging on publication (checklinks, SOTD, change description)
Editing in the Wiki
Tonight's minutes edited
Telecon attendees
ISSUE-74: XSD URIs for facets
ISSUE-91 informal semantics of ontology properties
ISSUE-92 (owl:Ontology to FS mapping): The RDF to FS mapping does not provide a mapping for the owl:Ontology element to the Functional Style syntax
Re: minutes on wiki
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 2nd 2008 (Today)
two comments on XML Schema, RDF, and OWL datatypes (ISSUE-29)
- RDF (and OWL) datatypes vs XML Schema 1.1 datatypes
- a proposal for owl:Datarange (and datatype facets) (ISSUE-29, ISSUE-74)