- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:05:58 -0500 (EST)
- To: ivan@w3.org
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> Subject: Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:36:09 +0100 > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > [snip] > > However, round-tripping through RDF/XML is not possible in general because > > there are OWL ontologies written in the functional syntax that cannot be > > written in RDF/XML. > > I am surprised by this, I must admit. Can you elaborate on this? > > I know there are RDF graphs that cannot be expressed in RDF/XML. Are you > referring to some other problems? Nope, this is the problem. > Ivan > > > As it doesn't make sense to attempt to do something > > impossible, we shouldn't be trying to ensure round-tripping through > > RDF/XML in general. > > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider peter
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 14:35:15 UTC