- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:12:22 -0500 (EST)
- To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
- Cc: jjc@hpl.hp.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
I have changed the FS&SS doc - look for changes starting ISSUE-93. Part
of the change involved ISSUE-13. Changes for that have ISSUE-13 in the
change description.
I claim completion.
peter
PS: The changed section now reads
OWL 1.1 uses constants to describe atomic values, such as strings or
integers. The quoting mechanism in strings is a subset of the one used
in N-triples [RDF Test Cases].
string := '"' a Unicode string in normal form C with double quotes and
backslashes replaced by the double quote or backslash preceeded by a
backslash '"'
languageTag := a language tag as specified in [RFC-4646]
untypedConstant := string [ '@' languageTag ]
typedConstant := string '^^' datatypeURI
constant := typedConstant | untypedConstant
From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: possible agenda amendment Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:34:58 +0000
> It currently has the status of a raised issue, but is also tagged as
> EDITORIAL. Thus, if someone (Peter?) wants to deal with it, we can
> move it to the "Resolved Editorial Issues" section and deal with it
> in in one go.
>
> Ian
>
>
> On 17 Jan 2008, at 11:25, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> >> We might consider putting ISSUE-93 into play, or even dispatching it.
> >> peter
> >
> > Since it is editorial (and essentially obviously correct) I would
> > expect the editors to make changes and report these to the WG.
> >
> > FWIW the language tags in the two RFCs 4646 and 3066 are compatible.
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
>
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:42:29 UTC