- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:12:22 -0500 (EST)
- To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
- Cc: jjc@hpl.hp.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
I have changed the FS&SS doc - look for changes starting ISSUE-93. Part of the change involved ISSUE-13. Changes for that have ISSUE-13 in the change description. I claim completion. peter PS: The changed section now reads OWL 1.1 uses constants to describe atomic values, such as strings or integers. The quoting mechanism in strings is a subset of the one used in N-triples [RDF Test Cases]. string := '"' a Unicode string in normal form C with double quotes and backslashes replaced by the double quote or backslash preceeded by a backslash '"' languageTag := a language tag as specified in [RFC-4646] untypedConstant := string [ '@' languageTag ] typedConstant := string '^^' datatypeURI constant := typedConstant | untypedConstant From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> Subject: Re: possible agenda amendment Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008 Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:34:58 +0000 > It currently has the status of a raised issue, but is also tagged as > EDITORIAL. Thus, if someone (Peter?) wants to deal with it, we can > move it to the "Resolved Editorial Issues" section and deal with it > in in one go. > > Ian > > > On 17 Jan 2008, at 11:25, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> We might consider putting ISSUE-93 into play, or even dispatching it. > >> peter > > > > Since it is editorial (and essentially obviously correct) I would > > expect the editors to make changes and report these to the WG. > > > > FWIW the language tags in the two RFCs 4646 and 3066 are compatible. > > > > Jeremy > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:42:29 UTC