- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:58:01 +0000
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Bijan Parsia wrote: > I think D (provide a test case) is a good idea and easy enough. > It might be worth pointing out the following (particularly to people for whom this is their first WG) - a test case helps communicate a decision, particularly to people who are not very up on our work - a good test case is often very, very simple. For example, almost any use of xsd:minInclusive or whatever is likely to break a system that has not implemented it at all. At least one test should have that goal. A more advanced test might be to do some datatype reasoning involving the facets (for example that the integers less than 0 and the integers greater than 0 are disjoint) It is quite possible to provide both a trivial test (is there any implmentation of this feature), and a not quite so trivial test (does the implementation actually do anything useful) While we probably should start producing test cases, the more we produce before we have 'test infrastructure' in place, the more migration work we are creating for ourselves. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 12:58:26 UTC