PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 as postponed

• From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:22:44 -0500
• To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <AC9A7B6F-F235-402B-9D89-A1FF3F6EAF86@gmail.com>

Following a discussion with Ian, in which we acknowledge Peter's  
comment below and subsequent discussion on the mailing list, and  
Jim's desire to postpone this issue,  Ian and I propose that we close  
the issue by postponing it, noting Peter's comment.

-Alan

On Dec 16, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> It appears to me that ISSUE-55 asks for a solution that eliminates  
> the differences between rdfs:Class and owl:Class, or a statement as  
> to why this is not a good idea.  There have already been statements  
> that say why rdfs:Class and owl:Class are different.

Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 05:22:57 UTC