Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:01:23 +0000
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <479756C3.8060100@hpl.hp.com>

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> OWL 1.0 DL is a sublanguage of OWL 1.0 Full so what changes here?
> 


We could present OWL 1.1 very differently:

define OWL 1.1 Full, and then a large number of fragments including OWL DL.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:02:16 UTC