- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:29:55 +0000
- To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Some of the potential difficulties in the proposed fixes seem to arise from various round-tripping concerns, e.g., what would happen if an ontology were "round-tripped" from 1.1 to 1.0 and back again. Do we need to concern ourselves with this? It seems to be setting the bar very high -- I doubt that many updates of languages or software would allow for such a thing. Ian On 23 Jan 2008, at 11:28, Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > > Hi, > > I've added a section on possible alternative fixes for ISSUE-90 and > ISSUE-91 to the ontology versions page on the wiki [1]. > > -Rinke > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Ontology_Versions#Possible_Fixes > > ----------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ----------------------------------------------- > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 10:30:12 UTC