- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:38:52 -0500
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 23:39:06 UTC
I think specifying Manch syntax is worth considering, given that there is commercial deployment experience and a decent following for it. Possible routes for doing this would be submission, WG note, Rec track, along the lines of the XML syntax. That would address the legitimate concern about it's status, and might be an overall positive contribution to the community (does anyone know of an actual reference for it currently? I always land up futzing in the editor trying to get rid of the red underlines ;-). Thoughts from others? -Alan On Jan 21, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Bijan Parsia wrote: > As Rinke pointed out, Manchester syntax is used in Protege and in > TopBraid composer (which is, as you know, a commercial project). > Turtle was used as the syntax for SPARQL when it was only a Dave > Beckett thing (and the Team Submission came out very close to rec > time for SPARQL :)). On this model, I would be happy to draft up a > spec for it as an appendix, or as a WG note or Member submission.
Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 23:39:06 UTC