Re: nonmon mapping and punning

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: nonmon mapping and punning
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:20:53 +0000

> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> > For example, making owl11:objectPropertyDomain be a subproperty of
> > rdfs:domain would remove the apparent non-monotonicity in the example
> > given.
> > 
> >
> Yes but ...
> 
> the concern is what a triple based implementation would actually have to 
> do - and modifying a triple in response to adding a triple would be a 
> fundamental change, that is out-of-kilter with the design principles 
> that we have used to date.
> 
> Jeremy

When would a triple-based implementation have to modify "a triple in
response to adding a triple"?  Which design principle does this violate,
and where did it come from?



peter

Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:38:03 UTC