- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:47:01 +0000
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Fulfilling ACTION-63 concerning ISSUE-74 [snip] > I believe (A) is uncontentious, I support (A) as a resolution. > I add B-D for discussion. I believe this is a perfectly fine way forward and better than "waiting for the W3C Schema group to get back to us". It's easy enough to change if they have legitimate objections. I think D (provide a test case) is a good idea and easy enough. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 11:47:14 UTC