- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 02:23:59 -0500 (EST)
- To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
What is the difference between POSTPONING an issue versus simply CLOSING the issue in this WG? (The reasoning I am asking is that I am unclear as to whether there is any technical or resource reason why this issue should be postponed instead of closed.) Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> Subject: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 as postponed Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:22:44 -0500 > Following a discussion with Ian, in which we acknowledge Peter's > comment below and subsequent discussion on the mailing list, and > Jim's desire to postpone this issue, Ian and I propose that we close > the issue by postponing it, noting Peter's comment. > > -Alan > > On Dec 16, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > It appears to me that ISSUE-55 asks for a solution that eliminates > > the differences between rdfs:Class and owl:Class, or a statement as > > to why this is not a good idea. There have already been statements > > that say why rdfs:Class and owl:Class are different.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 07:49:40 UTC