public-owl-wg@w3.org from January 2008 by date

Thursday, 31 January 2008

• ACTION-70 More use cases for punning Markus Krötzsch
• Re: [meta] When and for what to use IRC in telecons? Bijan Parsia
• Re: [meta] When and for what to use IRC in telecons? Sandro Hawke
• RE: [meta] When and for what to use IRC in telecons? Michael Schneider
• Re: [meta] When and for what to use IRC in telecons? Rinke Hoekstra
• [meta] When and for what to use IRC in telecons? Michael Schneider
• Re: Fragments discussion Deborah L. McGuinness

Wednesday, 30 January 2008

• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) Boris Motik
• Conformance level example Uli Sattler
• Professional and constructive working practices Ian Horrocks
• Request for Comments: SKOS Reference: W3C Working Draft 25 January 2008 Miles, AJ \(Alistair\)
• Action-73 Description of UML Association Class and how it may relate to Class/ObjectProperty punning Evan Wallace
• Re: UFDTF minutes for 28 Jan 2008 Deborah L. McGuinness
• Reminder: Imports TF meeting Monday Feb 4, 10 AM EST Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: publicity page Ian Horrocks
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 30th, 2008 Ian Horrocks
• publicity page Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Fragments discussion Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Fragments discussion Deborah L. McGuinness

Tuesday, 29 January 2008

• RE: No facets mentioned in the RDF mapping document Michael Schneider
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 30th, 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• my personal reply to (Re: comments on RIF BLD from OWL WG) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: comments on RIF BLD from OWL WG Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 30th, 2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Ivan Herman
• Re: Pointers to the WG Note Drafts? Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Ian Horrocks
• Re: No facets mentioned in the RDF mapping document Ian Horrocks
• Re: URI's in syntax document Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-90 and ISSUE-91 backwards compatibility of versioning information: possible fixes Ian Horrocks
• Re: URI's in syntax document Ian Horrocks
• RE: DatatypeRestriction in semantics WD allows only one facet. A bug? Boris Motik
• Re: UFDTF minutes for 28 Jan 2008 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: DatatypeRestriction in semantics WD allows only one facet. A bug? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF minutes for 28 Jan 2008 Elisa F. Kendall

Monday, 28 January 2008

• DatatypeRestriction in semantics WD allows only one facet. A bug? Michael Schneider
• Fragments discussion Ian Horrocks
• UFDTF minutes for 28 Jan 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• FYI: SKOS Reference has just been published Ivan Herman
• Where is the forbidden RDF vocabulary? Michael Schneider
• RE: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Michael Schneider
• [UFDTF] My action to compare documents - a starting point for discussion tomorrow Elisa F. Kendall

Sunday, 27 January 2008

• RE: Primer Conrad Bock
• RE: A comment on the Primer draft, part 1 Introduction Conrad Bock

Saturday, 26 January 2008

• RE: Apologies (was Re: Punning discussion) Michael Schneider
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Ivan Herman

Friday, 25 January 2008

• Apologies (was Re: Punning discussion) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-54 definition of OWLPrime (RDFS 3.0) Evan Wallace
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: Useful deprecation Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Use cases for punning Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Michael Schneider
• Re: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Useful deprecation Jeremy Carroll
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Michael Schneider
• Re: Pointers to the WG Note Drafts? Alan Ruttenberg
• Pointers to the WG Note Drafts? Jim Hendler
• Re: A comment on the Primer draft, part 1 Introduction Jim Hendler
• Re: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Punning discussion Jim Hendler
• Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A comment on the Primer draft, part 1 Introduction Deborah L. McGuinness
• RE: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Michael Schneider
• Re: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Bijan Parsia
• Re: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ACTION-54 definition of OWLPrime (RDFS 3.0) Jim Hendler
• RE: Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Michael Schneider
• RE: Punning discussion Michael Schneider
• RE: Punning discussion Michael Schneider
• Re: A comment on the Primer draft, part 1 Introduction Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ACTION-54 definition of OWLPrime (RDFS 3.0) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A comment on the Primer draft, part 1 Introduction Jim Hendler
• Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Jim Hendler
• Re: ACTION-54 definition of OWLPrime (RDFS 3.0) Jim Hendler

Thursday, 24 January 2008

• Minutes of the Jan. 23 meeting are ready for review Doug Lenat
• Useful deprecation Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Evidence for use of deprecated language Elisa F. Kendall
• Re: Evidence for use of deprecated language Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Evidence for use of deprecated language Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Punning discussion Bijan Parsia
• Evidence for use of deprecated language Elisa F. Kendall
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: ACTION-54 definition of OWLPrime (RDFS 3.0) Michael Schneider
• Re: ACTION-54 definition of OWLPrime (RDFS 3.0) Jim Hendler
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Jim Hendler
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Jim Hendler
• ACTION-54 definition of OWLPrime (RDFS 3.0) Alan Wu
• RE: Use cases for punning Michael Schneider
• RE: Punning discussion Michael Schneider
• Re: Punning discussion Bijan Parsia
• Re: Use cases for punning Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Punning discussion Michael Schneider
• Re: question about annotations Jeremy Carroll
• Use cases for punning Boris Motik
• Re: question about annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• question about annotations Jeremy Carroll
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: A comment on the Primer draft, section 2.1 Databases. Jim Hendler
• Re: proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 23 January 2008

• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Alan Ruttenberg
• RESOLVED ISSUE-29 (owl:Datatype deprecated) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-15: Ontologies should not be required to include a URI Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-92 (owl:Ontology to FS mapping): The RDF to FS mapping does not provide a mapping for the owl:Ontology element to the Functional Style syntax Boris Motik
• proposal to close (as RESOLVED) ISSUE-90 (class and property deprecation) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Boris Motik
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008 Elisa F. Kendall
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Bijan Parsia
• RE: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: nonmon mapping and punning Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Boris Motik
• identifying yourself on telecons Sandro Hawke
• Re: nonmon mapping and punning Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008 Rinke Hoekstra
• A comment on the Primer draft, section 2.1 Databases. Alan Wu
• Re: nonmon mapping and punning Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: nonmon mapping and punning Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Evidence of user attitudes toward BNodes (was Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)) Jeremy Carroll
• Comments on Primer and Structural Ref. Experiment Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-69 Jeremy Carroll
• bnode skolemization during parsing? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: nonmon mapping and punning Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-69 Bijan Parsia
• Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Ivan Herman
• nonmon mapping and punning Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-69 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Punning discussion Jeremy Carroll
• Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Punning discussion Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Kashyap, Vipul
• Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Bijan Parsia
• RE: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-90 and ISSUE-91 backwards compatibility of versioning information: possible fixes Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-29 and ISSUE-74 status and Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: A comment on the Primer draft, part 1 Introduction Bijan Parsia
• URI's in syntax document Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Bijan Parsia
• A comment on the Primer draft, part 1 Introduction Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Ivan Herman
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-29 and ISSUE-74 status and Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008 Alan Ruttenberg
• Imports task force Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 22 January 2008

• Action-67 some examples on b-nodes issues and their impact on users Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Michael Smith
• Re: Punning discussion Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 23rd, 2008 Ian Horrocks
• Punning discussion Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-29: Situation of owl:DataRange in OWL-Full Michael Schneider
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Ivan Herman
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Jim Hendler
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Jim Hendler
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 21 January 2008

• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Bijan Parsia
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Jim Hendler
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Jim Hendler
• Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct Ivan Herman
• Re: UFDTF meeting pushed to next week for lack of quorum Bijan Parsia
• UFDTF meeting pushed to next week for lack of quorum Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Reminder: UFDTF TC Monday January 21, 2008 Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Bijan Parsia
• Primer review, part 2: Basic Notions Alan Ruttenberg
• Primer review, part 1 Introduction, Orientation sections Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: possible regrets for UFDTF TC 21 Jan Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Reminder: UFDTF TC Monday January 21, 2008 Alan Ruttenberg

Sunday, 20 January 2008

• Re: [UFDTF] Regrets for Monday, Jan 21 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: possible regrets for UFDTF TC 21 Jan Alan Ruttenberg
• [UFDTF] Regrets for Monday, Jan 21 Elisa F. Kendall
• possible regrets for UFDTF TC 21 Jan Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 19 January 2008

• Re: Primer Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: Primer Bijan Parsia
• Evidence of user attitudes toward BNodes (was Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?)) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Primer Bijan Parsia

Friday, 18 January 2008

• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Jim Hendler
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Michael Schneider
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Jeremy Carroll
• Consensus on ISSUE-73 (was Re: Universal Property) Bijan Parsia
• RE: Universal Property Carsten Lutz
• RE: Universal Property Conrad Bock
• Re: Universal Property Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Universal Property Carsten Lutz
• Re: Universal Property Jim Hendler
• Re: Universal Property Bijan Parsia
• Re: Universal Property Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Thursday, 17 January 2008

• Re: Universal Property Jim Hendler
• Primer Conrad Bock
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal and Test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Michael Smith
• Re: Proposal and Test cases Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Michael Schneider
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Minutes Jan 16... Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-93, editorial fixes for Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-29 datarange and plain literals with language tags Jeremy Carroll
• ISSUE-93 RFC 3066 lang tags Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes Jan 16... Martin Dzbor
• Re: possible agenda amendment Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: possible agenda amendment Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: FW: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Ivan Herman
• RE: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back Ivan Herman
• FW: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Michael Schneider

Wednesday, 16 January 2008

• Re: comments on the N3 and Turtle team submissions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Entities in ontologies [was Re: ACTION-61 (F2F minutes link fix up) complete and two points] Michael Smith
• ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with roundtripping when going from functional-style syntax into RDF and back OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• ACTION-61 (F2F minutes link fix up) complete and two points Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-29 datarange and plain literals with language tags Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ISSUE-29 datarange and plain literals with language tags Jeremy Carroll
• possible agenda amendment Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Universal Property Carsten Lutz
• About DENY proposal: ISSUE-73 infinite universe Michael Schneider
• About "deprecation" of 'owl:DataRange' Michael Schneider
• RE: No facets mentioned in the RDF mapping document Michael Schneider
• Universal Property Uli Sattler
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Bijan Parsia
• Re: No facets mentioned in the RDF mapping document Michael Smith
• No facets mentioned in the RDF mapping document Michael Schneider
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• comments on the N3 and Turtle team submissions Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-93 (Language tags): RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages Sandro Hawke
• Re: ISSUE-93 (Language tags): RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Turtle Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-93 (Language tags): RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages Sandro Hawke
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: ISSUE-93 (Language tags): RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• call for papers for OWLED 2008 DC (papers due 15 February) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Proposal to close (as POSTPONED) Issue 8 Michael Schneider

Tuesday, 15 January 2008

• RE: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-93 (Language tags): RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Proposal to close (as POSTPONED) Issue 8 Ian Horrocks
• Re: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Jeremy Carroll
• QCRs Jeremy Carroll
• RE: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 14 January 2008

• RE: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Michael Schneider
• RE: Introductions Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Jeremy Carroll
• RE: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Michael Schneider
• RE: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Michael Schneider
• Re: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Jeremy Carroll
• Re: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Jim Hendler
• Re: Introductions Jim Hendler
• OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions] Michael Schneider
• ISSUE-16 (entity annotations) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Introductions Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Introductions Michael Schneider
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-73 (was Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29)) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-73 (was Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29)) Uli Sattler
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-73 (was Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29)) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: a proposal for owl:Datarange (and datatype facets) (ISSUE-29, ISSUE-74) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Bijan Parsia
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Agenda amendment re: ISSUE-92, ISSUE-91, and ISSUE-90 Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: [UFDTF] Deb and Evan's outline proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008 Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST Deborah L. McGuinness
• Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST Elisa F. Kendall
• [UFDTF] Deb and Evan's outline proposal Alan Ruttenberg

Sunday, 13 January 2008

• Agenda amendment re: ISSUE-92, ISSUE-91, and ISSUE-90 Bijan Parsia
• Proposal and Test cases (Re: skolems: visible differences?) Bijan Parsia
• Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Bijan Parsia
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Bijan Parsia
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 16th, 2008 Ian Horrocks
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Bijan Parsia
• Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST Bijan Parsia
• Re: skolems: visible differences? Bijan Parsia
• Re: [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST Bijan Parsia

Saturday, 12 January 2008

• Re: skolems: visible differences? Alan Ruttenberg
• Choosing a time for a meeting of the imports task force Alan Ruttenberg
• [UFDTF] Next meeting Monday 1/14 12PM-1PM EST Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 11 January 2008

• EasyKeys proposal Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-83 and ISSUE-8 Ian Horrocks
• Re: help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) Phil Archer
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-83 and ISSUE-8 Bijan Parsia
• RE: Proposal to close ISSUE-73 (was Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29)) Boris Motik
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-83 and ISSUE-8 Jim Hendler

Thursday, 10 January 2008

• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-83 and ISSUE-8 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-83 and ISSUE-8 Jim Hendler
• Proposal to close ISSUE-83 and ISSUE-8 Bijan Parsia
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-73 (was Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29)) Jim Hendler
• Proposal to close ISSUE-69 Bijan Parsia
• Proposal to close ISSUE-73 (was Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29)) Bijan Parsia
• Re: help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) Jeremy Carroll
• help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Specifically on ISSUE-65 (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Specifically on ISSUE-65 (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) Bijan Parsia
• Specifically on ISSUE-65 (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) Bijan Parsia
• On tests in general Re: xsd facets proposal Jeremy Carroll
• Two small corrections (Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65)) Bijan Parsia
• Re: xsd facets proposal Bijan Parsia
• xsd facets proposal Jeremy Carroll
• Re: POWDER/OWL update Ivan Herman
• Re: My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65) Jim Hendler
• My ACTION-64 (to propose closing ISSUE-29) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65) Jim Hendler
• Minutes of 2008-01-09 telecon Jim Hendler
• Punning, typed vocabulary, and handling RDF graphs (and ISSUE-65) Bijan Parsia

Wednesday, 9 January 2008

• Publicising FPWDs Ian Horrocks
• POWDER/OWL update Jeremy Carroll
• Test process Jeremy Carroll
• Re: published Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

• published Sandro Hawke
• Re: Editing in the Wiki Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Reviewing minutes of Manchester F2F Bijan Parsia
• Reviewing minutes of Manchester F2F Ian Horrocks
• Re: Tonight's minutes edited Ian Horrocks
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 as postponed Sandro Hawke
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 as postponed Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 9th, 2008 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 as postponed Jim Hendler
• Re: Editing in the Wiki Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Editing in the Wiki Rinke Hoekstra

Monday, 7 January 2008

• Re: Editing in the Wiki Ian Horrocks

Tuesday, 8 January 2008

• Re: Tonight's minutes edited Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 as postponed Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-55 as postponed Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-83 (ACTION-51) Alan Ruttenberg

Monday, 7 January 2008

• Re: Tonight's minutes edited Bijan Parsia
• ACTION-38 Bijan Parsia
• ISSUE-15: Ontologies should not be required to include a URI Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF (and OWL) datatypes vs XML Schema 1.1 datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• a proposal for owl:Datarange (and datatype facets) (ISSUE-29, ISSUE-74) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RDF (and OWL) datatypes vs XML Schema 1.1 datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Sunday, 6 January 2008

• Re: converging on publication (checklinks, SOTD, change description) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 5 January 2008

• Re: converging on publication (checklinks, SOTD, change description) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: converging on publication (checklinks, SOTD, change description) Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 4 January 2008

• converging on publication (checklinks, SOTD, change description) Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 3 January 2008

• Re: Editing in the Wiki Rinke Hoekstra
• Editing in the Wiki Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-91 informal semantics of ontology properties Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 2 January 2008

• Tonight's minutes edited Bijan Parsia
• Telecon attendees Bijan Parsia
• ISSUE-74: XSD URIs for facets Michael Smith
• ISSUE-91 informal semantics of ontology properties Rinke Hoekstra
• ISSUE-92 (owl:Ontology to FS mapping): The RDF to FS mapping does not provide a mapping for the owl:Ontology element to the Functional Style syntax OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: minutes on wiki Evren Sirin
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday January 2nd 2008 (Today) Ian Horrocks
• two comments on XML Schema, RDF, and OWL datatypes (ISSUE-29) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: document preparation for publication Sandro Hawke

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2008 15:53:47 UTC