- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:57:02 +0000
- To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 23 Jan 2008, at 10:41, Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > > Hi, > > I find the use of 'URI' in the syntax document rather unclear. > There seem to be two different usages: > * one that denotes an identifier (as in ontologyURI, owlClassURI, > owlObjectPropertyURI), and > * one that denotes a type (as in annotationURI) I didn't completely understand this. An annotationURI is an identifier isn't it? -- it is a property name (in fact an annotation property name). > > It would be good to distinguish between the two, as it can get > really confusing (e.g. when trying to understand annotations). > Secondly, these names are based on the datatype of the value, and > not on their intended interpretation (trying to avoid the word > meaning here...). Sorry, but I didn't get this either. Which names did you mean? Ian > > -Rinke > > ----------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ----------------------------------------------- > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 09:57:14 UTC