- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:47:55 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > We might consider putting ISSUE-93 into play, or even dispatching it. > > peter > I note that Addison has reported elsewhere, that the next RFC in BCP47 has a wrinkle with respect to RFC 4646. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2008JanMar/0003 It appears to concern a feature that was written in RFC 4646 but never actually used in practice; that has now been redesigned. The feature is "extended language subtags" for "macro-languages" such as Chinese which encompasses the two distinct languages of Cantonese and Mandorin I suggest ignoring this wrinkle, and proceeding in the obvious way - update our reference, and ensure mentioning BCP 47 in the reference. We may find that 4646 is superceded before we get to Rec, in which case we might want to update again. (However, it is usually ill-advised to hold one's breadth while waiting for a standard!) Latest draft is: http://www.inter-locale.com/ID/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-11.html The macro language issue is discussed near the end of section 4.1 http://www.inter-locale.com/ID/draft-ietf-ltru-4646bis-11.html#choice Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 11:48:28 UTC