- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:24:17 +0000
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > >> in summary, not in favour of Skolemized semantics; but in favour of >> Skolemizing implementations. > > I don't think we have to say anything about implementations, do we? If all or most OWL implementations do things in a particular way, it is relevant to our decision. We shouldn't be making decisions in isolation from implementations (although implementators really get their say during the Candidate Rec phase). Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 14:24:47 UTC