- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:02:50 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Jan 17, 2008, at 9:24 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> On Jan 16, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >>> in summary, not in favour of Skolemized semantics; but in favour >>> of Skolemizing implementations. >> I don't think we have to say anything about implementations, do we? > > > If all or most OWL implementations do things in a particular way, > it is relevant to our decision. We shouldn't be making decisions in > isolation from implementations (although implementators really get > their say during the Candidate Rec phase). Is this then something you would consider a conformance level, along the lines of what we are discussing for OWLPrime? -Alan
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 15:03:09 UTC