- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 05:37:37 -0500 (EST)
- To: sandro@w3.org
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
I fixed the one real problem for syntax. There is still the problem that the Wiki software turns an example text URl into a link. I don't know how to turn that off. The differences from OWL 1.0 are abstracted in the abstract. :-) Changes from the submission (actually from lightly modified submission documents) can be easily gleaned from the change log. peter From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> Subject: converging on publication (checklinks, SOTD, change description) Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:30:25 -0500 > Editors, please check your links. There are some broken ones. Just > append ",checklinks" to the end of the wiki page URL to see them. (it > takes a couple of minutes to run, though.) > > (Ignore the complaints about favicon.ico, mediawiki.org, and w3.org/2007/OWL) > > EG Syntax has broken links for SROIQ, PFPS, and my.domain.com. (One > should use example.com, as per RFC 2606, not my.domain.com, as I > understand it.) > > Other than that, we're getting close to ready. > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl11-syntax-20080104/ > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl11-semantics-20080104/ > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl11-mapping-to-rdf-20080104/ > > I would really like (and management may require) a paragraph in each one > (probably in SOTD) which explains the difference from the submission and > the differences from OWL 1.0. > > Does anyone see anything else that needs to be changed before > publication? > > -- Sandro
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2008 11:02:39 UTC