- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:35:46 -0500 (EST)
- To: hendler@cs.rpi.edu
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org, sattler@cs.man.ac.uk, clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de
Umm, which issue, which objection? I could not find an issue whose title mentions a universal property. I also could not find an objection from Jeremy in the minutes of the last two TCs. peter From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu> Subject: Re: Universal Property Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:56:41 -0500 > I am uncomfortable with the closing of this issue over Jeremy's > objection - I see very little discussion of the issue, I see no use > cases or tests which have been proposed that separate the issue, and > I find the theoretical emails to be stuff I cannot understand -- so > RPI would like to go on record as voting against the closing of the > issue. We will not create a formal objection, but like Jeremy we > reserve the right to create an objection when the document that > actually explains this is published > -Jim Hendler > AC Rep > RPI >
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 10:04:13 UTC