Re: converging on publication (checklinks, SOTD, change description)

On 1/5/08, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
> I fixed the one real problem for syntax.  There is still the problem
> that the Wiki software turns an example text URl into a link.  I don't
> know how to turn that off.

Surround the link in question with <nowiki>...</nowiki>. See an
example on the sandbox page.

>
> The differences from OWL 1.0 are abstracted in the abstract.  :-)
>
> Changes from the submission (actually from lightly modified submission
> documents) can be easily gleaned from the change log.
>
> peter
>
>
> From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
> Subject: converging on publication (checklinks, SOTD, change description)
> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:30:25 -0500
>
> > Editors, please check your links.  There are some broken ones.  Just
> > append ",checklinks" to the end of the wiki page URL to see them.  (it
> > takes a couple of minutes to run, though.)
> >
> > (Ignore the complaints about favicon.ico, mediawiki.org, and w3.org/2007/OWL)
> >
> > EG Syntax has broken links for SROIQ, PFPS, and my.domain.com.  (One
> > should use example.com, as per RFC 2606, not my.domain.com, as I
> > understand it.)
> >
> > Other than that, we're getting close to ready.
> >
> >    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl11-syntax-20080104/
> >    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl11-semantics-20080104/
> >    http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl11-mapping-to-rdf-20080104/
> >
> > I would really like (and management may require) a paragraph in each one
> > (probably in SOTD) which explains the difference from the submission and
> > the differences from OWL 1.0.
> >
> > Does anyone see anything else that needs to be changed before
> > publication?
> >
> >      -- Sandro
>
>

Received on Saturday, 5 January 2008 14:36:40 UTC