- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:18:27 +0000
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Please find appended the (slightly amended) agenda for this week.
Teleconference.2008.01.23/Agenda
Call in details
If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead,
Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
* Date of Call: Wednesday January 23, 2007
* Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US),
18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
* Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
* Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
* IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
* Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
* Duration: 90 minutes
* Chair: Alan Ruttenberg
* Scribe: Scribe List
* Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.
2008.01.23/Agenda
Agenda
* ADMIN (15 min)
o Roll call
o Agenda amendments
o PROPOSED: Accept Minutes of 2008.01.09 teleconference
o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes
o Action items status
+ Pending Review Actions
+ Overdue Actions
* Proposals to Resolve Issues (10 mins)
o PROPOSED: close (as POSTPONED) Issue 8 (dataproperty
chains) as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/
2008Jan/0122.html
o PROPOSED: close (as RESOLVED) Issue 15 (Ontologies
should not be required to include a URI) as per http://lists.w3.org/
Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0019.html
o PROPOSED: close (as RESOLVED) Issue 29 (ser-defined
Datatypes: owl:DataRange vs rdfs:Datatype) as per http://lists.w3.org/
Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0017.html (see also http://
lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0147.html and thread)
* General Discussions (30 min)
o Punning may be useful for Metamodeling, narrow the gap
between DL and Full, and/or adversely affect OWL DL/Full
compatibility. Related issues include Issue 17 (role punning) Issue
65 (excessive duplication of vocabulary) and Issue 69 (punning is
incompatible with OWL Full); see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/
Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0184.html, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/
Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0185.html and http://lists.w3.org/
Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0186.html for a detailed
discussion of how typing and typed vocabulary interacts with punning.
To pun or not to pun (or how much to pun), that is the question!
* Issues (15 min)
o Raised Issues
o Resolved Editorial Issues
+ Issue 93 RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of
Languages
o Issue Discussions
+ Ontology annotations: see Issue 90, Issue 91 and
Issue 91
* Additional other business (5 min)
Next Week(s)
* General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
o Fragments and Conformance
o Imports
o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full
compatibility)
o Easy Keys
o Rich Annotations
Regrets
* Martin Dzbor (conference abroad, invited talk)
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 16:18:37 UTC