- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:18:27 +0000
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Please find appended the (slightly amended) agenda for this week. Teleconference.2008.01.23/Agenda Call in details If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC * Date of Call: Wednesday January 23, 2007 * Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US), 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris) * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK) * Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG) * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl]) * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla) * Duration: 90 minutes * Chair: Alan Ruttenberg * Scribe: Scribe List * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. 2008.01.23/Agenda Agenda * ADMIN (15 min) o Roll call o Agenda amendments o PROPOSED: Accept Minutes of 2008.01.09 teleconference o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes o Action items status + Pending Review Actions + Overdue Actions * Proposals to Resolve Issues (10 mins) o PROPOSED: close (as POSTPONED) Issue 8 (dataproperty chains) as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/ 2008Jan/0122.html o PROPOSED: close (as RESOLVED) Issue 15 (Ontologies should not be required to include a URI) as per http://lists.w3.org/ Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0019.html o PROPOSED: close (as RESOLVED) Issue 29 (ser-defined Datatypes: owl:DataRange vs rdfs:Datatype) as per http://lists.w3.org/ Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0017.html (see also http:// lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0147.html and thread) * General Discussions (30 min) o Punning may be useful for Metamodeling, narrow the gap between DL and Full, and/or adversely affect OWL DL/Full compatibility. Related issues include Issue 17 (role punning) Issue 65 (excessive duplication of vocabulary) and Issue 69 (punning is incompatible with OWL Full); see also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/ Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0184.html, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/ Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0185.html and http://lists.w3.org/ Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Dec/0186.html for a detailed discussion of how typing and typed vocabulary interacts with punning. To pun or not to pun (or how much to pun), that is the question! * Issues (15 min) o Raised Issues o Resolved Editorial Issues + Issue 93 RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages o Issue Discussions + Ontology annotations: see Issue 90, Issue 91 and Issue 91 * Additional other business (5 min) Next Week(s) * General Discussions (not necessarily in this order) o Fragments and Conformance o Imports o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full compatibility) o Easy Keys o Rich Annotations Regrets * Martin Dzbor (conference abroad, invited talk)
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 16:18:37 UTC