- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:53:23 -0500 (EST)
- To: sandro@w3.org
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> Subject: Re: ISSUE-93 (Language tags): RFC 3066 - Tags for the Identification of Languages Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:40:13 -0500 > > 2/ The current document points to a document that is controlled by a > > single person. I expect that this is not appropriate for a W3C > > rec-track document. > > I'm not following this closely, but I think you're talking about the > turtle spec, which got a step more official on Monday with: > http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/ > > (There's also http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/) > > -- Sandro Hmm. Only one, small, step more official. By publishing this document, David Beckett and Tim Berners-Lee have made a formal submission to W3C for discussion. Publication of this document by W3C indicates no endorsement of its content by W3C, nor that W3C has, is, or will be allocating any resources to the issues addressed by it. This document is not the product of a chartered W3C group, but is published as potential input to the W3C Process. Please consult the complete list of acknowledged W3C Team Submissions. I note that the n3 submission is full of typos and other grammatical problems, including at least five in the "Status of This Document" section. The Turtle submission also has a typo in its "Status of This Document" section. peter
Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 14:20:56 UTC