- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:52:19 +0000
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- CC: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Jim Hendler wrote: > > > Michael - I have no clue what the above means - the members of the WG > are bothering those who care about Full with details of DL -- the > charter makes it clear that, unfortunately IMO, this WG is responsible > for DL and Full, so all issues w/respect to Full are completely within > the WG charter and it is NOT "polluting" to have issues and actions with > respct to Full - in fact, if we don't, a question could be raised by the > AC as to whether we actually addressed our charter commitments. > I understood Michael's point being that for any task-force type sub-activity the minutae of "this needs to be done, and that needs to be done, and what choice are we making here" is best done in a way that the rest of the WG can easily ignore. I think this is pertinent. Not that the bigger issues and responsibilities can be ignored. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 16:52:57 UTC