public-comments-wcag20@w3.org from June 2007 by thread

Comments on WCAG 2.0 WD, 17 May 2007 Matt Morgan-May (Friday, 29 June)

Comments on WCAG 2.0 Guidelines srush@knowbility.org (Saturday, 30 June)

Eric Hansen comments on WCAG 2 Hansen, Eric (Saturday, 30 June)

EOWG new comments on WCAG 2.0 17 May 2007 Working Draft Judy Brewer (Saturday, 30 June)

How does \"I accept this license agreement\" type operation conform WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)

Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (1 of 2) Judy Brewer (Saturday, 30 June)

viewing size of non-text content without alternatives WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)

\"non-text content\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)

\"non-text content\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)

\"large scale\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 30 June)

\"keyboard interface\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"idioms\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"human language\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Contrast ratio\" definition and user-selected colours WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

resizing of form controls WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Handling non-conformance of one of many pages in a product WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\'Description of the URI\' does not map well to a \'product\' WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Requirement for \'7.) Full Pages\' may be too narrow WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Editorial WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Editorial WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Readability is broken WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Interface Design WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

What about non-visually evident? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

An advisory on anti-aliased fonts. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

A new Success Criterion regarding use of color. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Keep 2.4.4 as a Level-A Success Criterion. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Significant improvement over previous drafts. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Transcripts not given adequate relevance WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Transcript = text allows no captions WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Wording suggests that a link context is required WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

elevator safety code violations ---IHS WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Definition of \"Mechanism\" needs clarification WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Referencing User Agents and Assistive Technologies WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Defintion of \"programmatically determined link context\" refers to \"sentence\". WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Interruptions\" may warrant a higher priority WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Respecting OS keyboard accessibility features WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Optional components...\" meta-data reference, pt 2 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Optional components...\" typo and awkward sentence WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"machine-readable metadata\" preferred...but do UAs support it? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Non-Interference\" \"No Keyboard Trap\" dependend on UA/plugin as well WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Addition to \"Accessibility-Supported Technologies\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

IBM Comments to WCAG 2 May 17 Working Draft Andrew LaHart (Friday, 29 June)

\"all\" of the following requirements CAN\'T be met, as depends on chosen level WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Addition to \"Creating your own list...\" section. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Addition to \"Creating your own list...\" section. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Awkward and incomplete wording WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

bullet 2, \"checked\", seems unnecessary WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

just \"in text\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

reclassing it from AAA to A WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

mechanism, or should it be \"programmatically determined\", or both? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

whole SC seems unnecessary WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

just \"users with disabilities\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

the SC should be applicable even on a single page WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

in practice, difference between \"blink\" and \"flash\" still unclear, even with appendix WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

just \"users with disabilities\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

2.1.1. trying to cover two separate issues in one go? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

resized without AT (same issue as my comment to 1.4.4) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

resized without AT WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Awkwkard non-word \"turnon\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

just \"visually\" evident? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

just \"people with disabilities\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

just applicable to \"instructions\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Can CSS colour be classed as \"programmatically determined\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

prerecorded or pre-recorded? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

1.1. Non-text Content / Controls-Input WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Rewording 1.1 slightly to include pure text, and a comma WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Accessibility Supported\" awkward sentence WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Accessibility Supported\" comma and small change WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Programmatically Determined\" addition to last sentence WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Programmatically Determined\" awkward sentence WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Web Page\" definition and user agents, pt 2 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Web Page\" definition and user agents WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

\"Web Page\" definition WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Comma and \"but\" in \"Advisory Techniques\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Apologetic whining in \"Sufficient Techniques\" explanation WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Awkward wording for new technologies bit WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Awkward wording on confomance level WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

AT heavy \"levels of conformance\" bullet points WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Stray comma WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Sound Volume Control WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Stray comma and \"standard\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Accessible Technology WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Intro to the four principles WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

only 9 pages long WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Guidelines, not requirements? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Responsible for \"200%\" and 50%\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

How to measure dB(A) SPL and Tools WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Rationale for \"200%\" and 50%? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Why \"18 point or 14 point bold\"? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

What does \"accessibility support\" mean? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Why \"Documented lists\" needed? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

about \"Accessibility Supported\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Notes 1 and 2 on the Assistive Technology Definition WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

The presentation is unnecessarily difficult. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Use heading for different columns in web page layouts? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Let the user use her preferred format for input WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Present more techiques on how improve texts WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Change alternative number two \"Checked\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Add video-clips to illustrate solutions WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Replace term \"visually rendered\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Addition of a related resource WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Mention of the Microsoft Word Readability Formulas WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Replace example 4 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Human testers should always be persons with disabilities WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Symbols illustrating texts can be ignored by assistive technology WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Clearly identify supplemental content or alternate version WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Include criterion 3.1.5 in levels A and AA WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Reading level changed to primary education level WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

RE: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (1 of 3) Greg Lowney (Friday, 29 June)

Prohibiting images of important text WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

This SC is at a level that will not be adopted by many sites β?? it is too important to leave at β??AAAβ?? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

The phrasing of this SC is not definitive enough WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Time Limit for Access Control WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Time Limit for Security WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Guideline 2.2 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Layout using CSS WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Guideline 1.3 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

A, AA, AAA criteria WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

General WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Time Limit for Security/Access Control WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

How to measure dB(A) SPL and Tools WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Grounds for \"200%\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Re: Stronger statement about accessibility for people with cognitive disability Sandra Vassallo (Friday, 29 June)

Text resizing WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Clarification on Conformance Requirements for Alternative Content WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

doing a little more for people with cognitive limitations WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Success Criterion score WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Increase SC for 3.3.4 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

3.1.4 SC should be AA WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

SC level for 3.1.3 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

SC 2.4.8 should be at higher level WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

contrast ratio SC level WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Does HTML using pt or px meet this with today\'s user agents? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Stronger statement about accessibility for people with cognitive disability WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Skip links are not required to be visible (G1) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Add definition of testability to Guidelines (Introduction & Glossary) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Not clear that it\'s ok to provide directions once for a site. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Which sc covers frame names? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Guideline does not mention the need for equivalent alternatives (only SC). WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Should Icons be included in contrast requirements? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

The parenthetical phrase is confusing WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

The relationship between labels and names is not clear enough. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Please Remove the \"Testability\" Requirement WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 29 June)

Site listed in resources appears to have some issues WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

ddncofhbvk WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

mclawuoouc WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

Testing for everything is unworkable. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

Does video with synchronized captions fit into 1.2? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

Multimedia and Video confusion WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

Add Exception to 3.1.1 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

Should 2.4.9 be a AA requirement? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

2.4.8 is not clearly differentiated from 2.4.4 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

2.1.1 and 2.1.2 don\'t seem to have a clear distinction WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

Why is Sign Language not required on non-multimedia WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

confussion with non-live audio/video WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

WCAG 2 reads well WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

comments and issues on http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/ Lisa Seeman (Thursday, 28 June)

techniques document review Lisa Seeman (Thursday, 28 June)

Testability WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 28 June)

SC-958, 1218 not quite agree [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...] Al Gilman (Wednesday, 27 June)

LC-1209 agree w/comment Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...] Al Gilman (Wednesday, 27 June)

Wording not explicit enough, and too similar to 2.4.4 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)

Suggested additional qualification WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)

Wording - \"easier\" (than what?) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)

Exceptions for single words and other classes of words WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)

too vague WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)

Testability is dramatically hurting the WCAG WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)

teastability WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)

Fwd: Reminder - request for response on WCAG 2.0 comments Loretta Guarino Reid (Wednesday, 27 June)

Comment LC-1053 Gian Sampson-Wild (Wednesday, 27 June)

Remove testability requirements WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 27 June)

Comment LC-1052 Gian Sampson-Wild (Wednesday, 27 June)

Comment LC-1051 Gian Sampson-Wild (Wednesday, 27 June)

SC 1.1.1 and 2.4 6 [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] Al Gilman (Tuesday, 26 June)

Automatic testing WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Level of priority WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

H1-H6, Leval A or AAA? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

better but still dommageable concept WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

common failure and Sufficient Techniques matching WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

more ergonomic problem than accessibility problem WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

testability WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Use of wmode WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Invalide test procedure WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Use alternative versions only when necessary WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Limts on pronunciations WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Headings as AA WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Use Headings as well as make them meaningful WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

lang in attribut WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

direct context or DOM context WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Limits on user controlled timed events WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

wrong sucess criteria association WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

wrong sucess criteria association WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1047 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1044 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

LC-1043 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1042 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1041 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1040 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1039 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1038 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1037 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

RE: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (2 of 8) Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

Comment LC-1034 Gian Sampson-Wild (Tuesday, 26 June)

\"Authoring tools\" section has been removed WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Definition of \"Technology\" should be changed to allow synchronization with AUWG\'s definition of \"content type\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Frame technique promote old fashion web WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

UA bug on object WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Good job done WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Contents ordering is odd WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Inconsistent treatment of null content (2) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Inconsistent treatment of null content WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Confusing linkage between documents WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Clarify 2.4.4 by adding \"taken together\" or \"together with\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 25 June)

Comment LC-1033 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1032 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1031 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1030 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1029 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1028 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1027 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1026 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1024 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1022 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1023 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Please choose your side, UA bug or not ? WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1021 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Comment LC-1020 Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

RE: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (1 of 8) Gian Sampson-Wild (Sunday, 24 June)

Contrast value and background problem WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)

Use of color information for contextual distinction WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)

missing information on common failures WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)

contextual caption and summary WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)

level of this success criterion WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)

contextual alternative WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 24 June)

LC-1200, 1203, 1204, 1206 disagree [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

LC-979 respectfully disagree [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

a few more A-OK dispositions [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

LC-1214 accept with comment Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

LC-1213 accept w/comment Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

disagree LC-1202 (with how to salvage...) [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...] Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

LC-1201 accept w/fresh comment [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

disagree LC-1196 [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] Al Gilman (Saturday, 23 June)

disagree LC-1195 [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...] Al Gilman (Friday, 22 June)

LC-978 OK w/comment [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft...] Al Gilman (Friday, 22 June)

Re: Reminder -- request for response on WCAG 2.0 comments Arun (Thursday, 21 June)

Definition of the wider range of people WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 20 June)

Example in the intent for change of context is not a change of context WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 18 June)

Adding \"at least\" to second sentances of 1.4.3 & 1.4.5 WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Monday, 18 June)

Fwd: Fwd: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Loretta Guarino Reid (Monday, 18 June)

A-OK dispositions [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (n of 4)] Al Gilman (Sunday, 17 June)

Links give context - CORRECTION WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 16 June)

Fwd: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Judy Brewer (Saturday, 16 June)

Overview content tweak Craig Francis (Saturday, 16 June)

Links give context WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 June)

Ban hiding link text WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 June)

Ban hiding link text WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 June)

Page title as context WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 15 June)

1.4.3 & 1.4.5 Contrast ratio of disabled elements WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 13 June)

Re: W3C Process and WCAG 2.0 Public Working Draft 17/05/07 ~:'' γ‚γ‚ŠγŒγ¨γ†γ”γ–γ„γΎγ—γŸγ€‚ (Tuesday, 12 June)

LC-1302 NOT SATISFIED Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)

LC 1307 NOT SATISFIED Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)

LC-1320 NEW PROBLEM Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)

LC-1308 SATISFIED Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)

LC-1309 SATISFIED Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Charles McCathieNevile (Monday, 11 June)

Lack of attention to the deaf people needs. WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Sunday, 10 June)

Consider this technique for 2.4.1 Sailesh Panchang (Sunday, 10 June)

SC 2.4.1: use of term "block of content" Sailesh Panchang (Sunday, 10 June)

Techniques for WCAG 2: F42 Sailesh Panchang (Sunday, 10 June)

Techniques for WCAG 2: F42 Sailesh Panchang (Sunday, 10 June)

Trying to help readability WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 9 June)

user agent detection WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Saturday, 9 June)

Not clear whether web pages should use W3C technologies WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 8 June)

Should prohibit \"relies upon scripting\" WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Friday, 8 June)

Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (Issue ID: LC-712) Jaakko.Vilen@nordea.com (Thursday, 7 June)

No provision for link highlighting WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Thursday, 7 June)

SCR21: Using functions of the Document Object Model (DOM) to add content to a page Maciej Jaros (Thursday, 7 June)

Clarification of Text, image of text, and visually randered text WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 6 June)

WCAG-WG's response to comments Sailesh Panchang (Wednesday, 6 June)

Testing comment form (please ignore) WCAG 2.0 Comment Form (Wednesday, 6 June)

Comments on WCAG 2.0 Draft of May 2007 Martin Stehle (Wednesday, 6 June)

Eric Hansen reaction to WCAG 2.0 WG responses to Eric's comments on the 2006 working draft Hansen, Eric (Wednesday, 6 June)

Fwd: Reminder - request for response on WCAG 2.0 comments Loretta Guarino Reid (Wednesday, 6 June)

Response from Jon Gunderson on Comment 3 and 4 Jon Gunderson (Wednesday, 6 June)

Response from Jon Gunderson on Comment 2 Jon Gunderson (Wednesday, 6 June)

Response from Jon Gunderson on Comment 1 Jon Gunderson (Wednesday, 6 June)

comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 - response to WG Andrew Arch (Wednesday, 6 June)

[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 5: H56 source text ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)

[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 4: H56 incorrect link target ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)

[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 3: H56 link to bidi primer ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)

[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 2: H34 use of entities ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)

[WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment 1: H34 example source direction ishida@w3.org (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: rp doesn't provide information Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Ruby resources Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: H62 Ex4 descn Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Commonness of ruby Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: pr tags missing Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Description of ruby positions Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 in H58 tests Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Tests ignore xml:lang Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Language tagging link Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: XML 1.01 Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: je ne sais quoi Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in H58 title Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 reference in tests Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in tests Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Bidi links Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Direction of text Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 links Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Tutorial link Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: head missing Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: XHTML 1.0 Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in H57 title Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Primary natural language Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Repeated Japanese text Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Non-English resources please Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Missing xml:lang Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Lang value length Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: No pointer to i18n language decl doc Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Liam's resources Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Content in two languages Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

[UND WCAG2] i18n comment: dc:lang Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

RE: [WCAG2] i18n comment: Natural languages Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

Re: [WCAG2] i18n comment 2: Primary natural language Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

Re: [WCAG2] i18n comment: Provide simpler text Richard Ishida (Wednesday, 6 June)

comment on responses to comments on WCAG 2.0 27 April 2006 draft Johannes Koch (Wednesday, 6 June)

Thanks for the reply Shibu (Wednesday, 6 June)

Re: Reminder - request for response on WCAG 2.0 comments Alexandre Alapetite (Wednesday, 6 June)

Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Loretta Guarino Reid (Tuesday, 5 June)

RE: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 Gregg Vanderheiden (Friday, 1 June)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 18:52:39 UTC