Inconsistent treatment of null content (2)

Name: Philip Naylor
Email: P.J.Naylor@bristol.ac.uk
Affiliation: University of Bristol
Document: UW
Item Number: Understanding Success Criterion 2.1.2
Part of Item: Common Failures
Comment Type: editorial
Summary of Issue: Inconsistent treatment of null content (2)
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
Section 2.1.2 is missing parts form \"Common Failures\", \"Additional Techniques\", \"Examples\", and \"Related Resources\".  Even if there are none, this is inconsistent with other sections where the lack of information is explicitly stated.

Proposed Change:
Add boilerplate text to section 2.1.2 for the missing parts, as per other sections.

Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 14:01:52 UTC