W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > June 2007

RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: pr tags missing

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:23:29 +0100
To: <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009d01c7a824$ba864840$6401a8c0@rishida>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ishida@w3.org
> Sent: 27 June 2006 19:54
> To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: pr tags missing
> 
> 
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/
> 
> Comment 20
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-wcag2-techniques/
> Editorial/substantive: S
> Owner: RI
> 
> Location in reviewed document:
> H62, Examples
> 
> Comment: 
> Examples 1 and 2 should have rp tags. There is no good reason 
> to leave them out. This will just set a bad example.
> 
> 
> This comment, of course, affects Example 3 also.



=================================
> From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com]
> Sent: 18 May 2007 00:43
> To: Richard Ishida
> Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
> Subject: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April
> 2006 (2 of 2)

> Comment 29:

> ----------------------------
> Response from Working Group:
> ----------------------------
> 
> Thank you for your comment. We've removed example 1 and 2, 
> and modified the other examples to explain the use of the rp tags.


Thank you. The i18n Core WG is satisfied by this.


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
 
http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 
 
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 10:22:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:08 UTC