Al Gilman
- SC-958, 1218 not quite agree [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...] (Wednesday, 27 June)
- LC-1209 agree w/comment Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...] (Wednesday, 27 June)
- SC 1.1.1 and 2.4 6 [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] (Tuesday, 26 June)
- LC-1200, 1203, 1204, 1206 disagree [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] (Saturday, 23 June)
- LC-979 respectfully disagree [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] (Saturday, 23 June)
- a few more A-OK dispositions [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] (Saturday, 23 June)
- LC-1214 accept with comment Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] (Saturday, 23 June)
- LC-1213 accept w/comment Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] (Saturday, 23 June)
- disagree LC-1202 (with how to salvage...) [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...] (Saturday, 23 June)
- LC-1201 accept w/fresh comment [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] (Saturday, 23 June)
- disagree LC-1196 [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call...] (Saturday, 23 June)
- disagree LC-1195 [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call ...] (Friday, 22 June)
- LC-978 OK w/comment [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft...] (Friday, 22 June)
- A-OK dispositions [was: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (n of 4)] (Sunday, 17 June)
Alastair Campbell
Alexandre Alapetite
Andi Snow-Weaver
Andrew Arch
Andrew LaHart
Arun
Bailey Bruce
Ben Caldwell
Charles McCathieNevile
Christophe Strobbe
Craig Francis
David MacDonald
Gian Sampson-Wild
- Comment LC-1053 (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Comment LC-1052 (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Comment LC-1051 (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Comment LC-1047 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1044 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- LC-1043 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1042 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1041 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1040 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1039 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1038 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1037 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- RE: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (2 of 8) (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1034 (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Comment LC-1033 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1032 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1031 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1030 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1029 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1028 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1027 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1026 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1024 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1022 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1023 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1021 (Sunday, 24 June)
- Comment LC-1020 (Sunday, 24 June)
- RE: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April 2006 (1 of 8) (Sunday, 24 June)
Greg Gay
Greg Lowney
Gregg Vanderheiden
Hansen, Eric
Ian B. Jacobs
ishida@w3.org
Jaakko.Vilen@nordea.com
Jason Gottshall
Jim Thatcher
Johannes Koch
Jon Gunderson
Judy Brewer
Kiyochika Nakamura
Lachlan Hunt
Liddy Nevile
Lisa Seeman
Loretta Guarino Reid
Maciej Jaros
Martin Stehle
Matt Morgan-May
Richard Ishida
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: rp doesn't provide information (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Ruby resources (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: H62 Ex4 descn (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Commonness of ruby (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: pr tags missing (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Description of ruby positions (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 in H58 tests (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Tests ignore xml:lang (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Language tagging link (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: XML 1.01 (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: je ne sais quoi (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in H58 title (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 reference in tests (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in tests (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Bidi links (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Direction of text (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: RFC 3066 links (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: Tutorial link (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: head missing (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: XHTML 1.0 (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: xml:lang missing in H57 title (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Primary natural language (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Repeated Japanese text (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Non-English resources please (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Missing xml:lang (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Lang value length (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: No pointer to i18n language decl doc (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Liam's resources (Wednesday, 6 June)
- [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: Content in two languages (Wednesday, 6 June)
- [UND WCAG2] i18n comment: dc:lang (Wednesday, 6 June)
- RE: [WCAG2] i18n comment: Natural languages (Wednesday, 6 June)
- Re: [WCAG2] i18n comment 2: Primary natural language (Wednesday, 6 June)
- Re: [WCAG2] i18n comment: Provide simpler text (Wednesday, 6 June)
Sailesh Panchang
Sandra Vassallo
Shawn Henry
Shibu
srush@knowbility.org
Wayne Dick
WCAG 2.0 Comment Form
- How does \"I accept this license agreement\" type operation conform (Saturday, 30 June)
- viewing size of non-text content without alternatives (Saturday, 30 June)
- \"non-text content\" (Saturday, 30 June)
- \"non-text content\" (Saturday, 30 June)
- \"large scale\" (Saturday, 30 June)
- \"keyboard interface\" (Friday, 29 June)
- \"idioms\" (Friday, 29 June)
- \"human language\" (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Contrast ratio\" definition and user-selected colours (Friday, 29 June)
- resizing of form controls (Friday, 29 June)
- Handling non-conformance of one of many pages in a product (Friday, 29 June)
- \'Description of the URI\' does not map well to a \'product\' (Friday, 29 June)
- Requirement for \'7.) Full Pages\' may be too narrow (Friday, 29 June)
- Editorial (Friday, 29 June)
- Editorial (Friday, 29 June)
- Readability is broken (Friday, 29 June)
- Interface Design (Friday, 29 June)
- What about non-visually evident? (Friday, 29 June)
- An advisory on anti-aliased fonts. (Friday, 29 June)
- A new Success Criterion regarding use of color. (Friday, 29 June)
- Keep 2.4.4 as a Level-A Success Criterion. (Friday, 29 June)
- Significant improvement over previous drafts. (Friday, 29 June)
- Transcripts not given adequate relevance (Friday, 29 June)
- Transcript = text allows no captions (Friday, 29 June)
- Wording suggests that a link context is required (Friday, 29 June)
- elevator safety code violations ---IHS (Friday, 29 June)
- Definition of \"Mechanism\" needs clarification (Friday, 29 June)
- Referencing User Agents and Assistive Technologies (Friday, 29 June)
- Defintion of \"programmatically determined link context\" refers to \"sentence\". (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Interruptions\" may warrant a higher priority (Friday, 29 June)
- Respecting OS keyboard accessibility features (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Optional components...\" meta-data reference, pt 2 (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Optional components...\" typo and awkward sentence (Friday, 29 June)
- \"machine-readable metadata\" preferred...but do UAs support it? (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Non-Interference\" \"No Keyboard Trap\" dependend on UA/plugin as well (Friday, 29 June)
- Addition to \"Accessibility-Supported Technologies\" (Friday, 29 June)
- \"all\" of the following requirements CAN\'T be met, as depends on chosen level (Friday, 29 June)
- Addition to \"Creating your own list...\" section. (Friday, 29 June)
- Addition to \"Creating your own list...\" section. (Friday, 29 June)
- Awkward and incomplete wording (Friday, 29 June)
- bullet 2, \"checked\", seems unnecessary (Friday, 29 June)
- just \"in text\"? (Friday, 29 June)
- reclassing it from AAA to A (Friday, 29 June)
- mechanism, or should it be \"programmatically determined\", or both? (Friday, 29 June)
- whole SC seems unnecessary (Friday, 29 June)
- just \"users with disabilities\"? (Friday, 29 June)
- the SC should be applicable even on a single page (Friday, 29 June)
- in practice, difference between \"blink\" and \"flash\" still unclear, even with appendix (Friday, 29 June)
- just \"users with disabilities\"? (Friday, 29 June)
- 2.1.1. trying to cover two separate issues in one go? (Friday, 29 June)
- resized without AT (same issue as my comment to 1.4.4) (Friday, 29 June)
- resized without AT (Friday, 29 June)
- Awkwkard non-word \"turnon\" (Friday, 29 June)
- just \"visually\" evident? (Friday, 29 June)
- just \"people with disabilities\"? (Friday, 29 June)
- just applicable to \"instructions\"? (Friday, 29 June)
- Can CSS colour be classed as \"programmatically determined\"? (Friday, 29 June)
- prerecorded or pre-recorded? (Friday, 29 June)
- 1.1. Non-text Content / Controls-Input (Friday, 29 June)
- Rewording 1.1 slightly to include pure text, and a comma (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Accessibility Supported\" awkward sentence (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Accessibility Supported\" comma and small change (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Programmatically Determined\" addition to last sentence (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Programmatically Determined\" awkward sentence (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Web Page\" definition and user agents, pt 2 (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Web Page\" definition and user agents (Friday, 29 June)
- \"Web Page\" definition (Friday, 29 June)
- Comma and \"but\" in \"Advisory Techniques\" (Friday, 29 June)
- Apologetic whining in \"Sufficient Techniques\" explanation (Friday, 29 June)
- Awkward wording for new technologies bit (Friday, 29 June)
- Awkward wording on confomance level (Friday, 29 June)
- AT heavy \"levels of conformance\" bullet points (Friday, 29 June)
- Stray comma (Friday, 29 June)
- Sound Volume Control (Friday, 29 June)
- Stray comma and \"standard\"? (Friday, 29 June)
- Accessible Technology (Friday, 29 June)
- Intro to the four principles (Friday, 29 June)
- only 9 pages long (Friday, 29 June)
- Guidelines, not requirements? (Friday, 29 June)
- Responsible for \"200%\" and 50%\" (Friday, 29 June)
- How to measure dB(A) SPL and Tools (Friday, 29 June)
- Rationale for \"200%\" and 50%? (Friday, 29 June)
- Why \"18 point or 14 point bold\"? (Friday, 29 June)
- What does \"accessibility support\" mean? (Friday, 29 June)
- Why \"Documented lists\" needed? (Friday, 29 June)
- about \"Accessibility Supported\" (Friday, 29 June)
- Notes 1 and 2 on the Assistive Technology Definition (Friday, 29 June)
- The presentation is unnecessarily difficult. (Friday, 29 June)
- Use heading for different columns in web page layouts? (Friday, 29 June)
- Let the user use her preferred format for input (Friday, 29 June)
- Present more techiques on how improve texts (Friday, 29 June)
- Change alternative number two \"Checked\" (Friday, 29 June)
- Add video-clips to illustrate solutions (Friday, 29 June)
- Replace term \"visually rendered\" (Friday, 29 June)
- Addition of a related resource (Friday, 29 June)
- Mention of the Microsoft Word Readability Formulas (Friday, 29 June)
- Replace example 4 (Friday, 29 June)
- Human testers should always be persons with disabilities (Friday, 29 June)
- Symbols illustrating texts can be ignored by assistive technology (Friday, 29 June)
- Clearly identify supplemental content or alternate version (Friday, 29 June)
- Include criterion 3.1.5 in levels A and AA (Friday, 29 June)
- Reading level changed to primary education level (Friday, 29 June)
- Prohibiting images of important text (Friday, 29 June)
- This SC is at a level that will not be adopted by many sites β?? it is too important to leave at β??AAAβ?? (Friday, 29 June)
- The phrasing of this SC is not definitive enough (Friday, 29 June)
- Time Limit for Access Control (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission (Friday, 29 June)
- Time Limit for Security (Friday, 29 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission (Friday, 29 June)
- Guideline 2.2 (Friday, 29 June)
- Layout using CSS (Friday, 29 June)
- Guideline 1.3 (Friday, 29 June)
- A, AA, AAA criteria (Friday, 29 June)
- General (Friday, 29 June)
- Time Limit for Security/Access Control (Friday, 29 June)
- How to measure dB(A) SPL and Tools (Friday, 29 June)
- Grounds for \"200%\" (Friday, 29 June)
- Text resizing (Friday, 29 June)
- Clarification on Conformance Requirements for Alternative Content (Friday, 29 June)
- doing a little more for people with cognitive limitations (Friday, 29 June)
- Success Criterion score (Friday, 29 June)
- Increase SC for 3.3.4 (Friday, 29 June)
- 3.1.4 SC should be AA (Friday, 29 June)
- SC level for 3.1.3 (Friday, 29 June)
- SC 2.4.8 should be at higher level (Friday, 29 June)
- contrast ratio SC level (Friday, 29 June)
- Does HTML using pt or px meet this with today\'s user agents? (Friday, 29 June)
- Stronger statement about accessibility for people with cognitive disability (Friday, 29 June)
- Skip links are not required to be visible (G1) (Friday, 29 June)
- Add definition of testability to Guidelines (Introduction & Glossary) (Friday, 29 June)
- Not clear that it\'s ok to provide directions once for a site. (Friday, 29 June)
- Which sc covers frame names? (Friday, 29 June)
- Guideline does not mention the need for equivalent alternatives (only SC). (Friday, 29 June)
- Should Icons be included in contrast requirements? (Friday, 29 June)
- The parenthetical phrase is confusing (Friday, 29 June)
- The relationship between labels and names is not clear enough. (Friday, 29 June)
- Please Remove the \"Testability\" Requirement (Friday, 29 June)
- Site listed in resources appears to have some issues (Thursday, 28 June)
- ddncofhbvk (Thursday, 28 June)
- mclawuoouc (Thursday, 28 June)
- Testing for everything is unworkable. (Thursday, 28 June)
- Does video with synchronized captions fit into 1.2? (Thursday, 28 June)
- Multimedia and Video confusion (Thursday, 28 June)
- Add Exception to 3.1.1 (Thursday, 28 June)
- Should 2.4.9 be a AA requirement? (Thursday, 28 June)
- 2.4.8 is not clearly differentiated from 2.4.4 (Thursday, 28 June)
- 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 don\'t seem to have a clear distinction (Thursday, 28 June)
- Why is Sign Language not required on non-multimedia (Thursday, 28 June)
- confussion with non-live audio/video (Thursday, 28 June)
- WCAG 2 reads well (Thursday, 28 June)
- Testability (Thursday, 28 June)
- Wording not explicit enough, and too similar to 2.4.4 (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Suggested additional qualification (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Wording - \"easier\" (than what?) (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Exceptions for single words and other classes of words (Wednesday, 27 June)
- too vague (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Testability is dramatically hurting the WCAG (Wednesday, 27 June)
- teastability (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Remove testability requirements (Wednesday, 27 June)
- Automatic testing (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Level of priority (Tuesday, 26 June)
- H1-H6, Leval A or AAA? (Tuesday, 26 June)
- better but still dommageable concept (Tuesday, 26 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission (Tuesday, 26 June)
- common failure and Sufficient Techniques matching (Tuesday, 26 June)
- more ergonomic problem than accessibility problem (Tuesday, 26 June)
- testability (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Use of wmode (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Invalide test procedure (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Use alternative versions only when necessary (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Limts on pronunciations (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Headings as AA (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Use Headings as well as make them meaningful (Tuesday, 26 June)
- lang in attribut (Tuesday, 26 June)
- direct context or DOM context (Tuesday, 26 June)
- WCAG 2.0 Comment Submission (Tuesday, 26 June)
- Limits on user controlled timed events (Tuesday, 26 June)
- wrong sucess criteria association (Tuesday, 26 June)
- wrong sucess criteria association (Tuesday, 26 June)
- \"Authoring tools\" section has been removed (Monday, 25 June)
- Definition of \"Technology\" should be changed to allow synchronization with AUWG\'s definition of \"content type\" (Monday, 25 June)
- Frame technique promote old fashion web (Monday, 25 June)
- UA bug on object (Monday, 25 June)
- Good job done (Monday, 25 June)
- Contents ordering is odd (Monday, 25 June)
- Inconsistent treatment of null content (2) (Monday, 25 June)
- Inconsistent treatment of null content (Monday, 25 June)
- Confusing linkage between documents (Monday, 25 June)
- Clarify 2.4.4 by adding \"taken together\" or \"together with\" (Monday, 25 June)
- Please choose your side, UA bug or not ? (Sunday, 24 June)
- Contrast value and background problem (Sunday, 24 June)
- Use of color information for contextual distinction (Sunday, 24 June)
- missing information on common failures (Sunday, 24 June)
- contextual caption and summary (Sunday, 24 June)
- level of this success criterion (Sunday, 24 June)
- contextual alternative (Sunday, 24 June)
- Definition of the wider range of people (Wednesday, 20 June)
- Example in the intent for change of context is not a change of context (Monday, 18 June)
- Adding \"at least\" to second sentances of 1.4.3 & 1.4.5 (Monday, 18 June)
- Links give context - CORRECTION (Saturday, 16 June)
- Links give context (Friday, 15 June)
- Ban hiding link text (Friday, 15 June)
- Ban hiding link text (Friday, 15 June)
- Page title as context (Friday, 15 June)
- 1.4.3 & 1.4.5 Contrast ratio of disabled elements (Wednesday, 13 June)
- Lack of attention to the deaf people needs. (Sunday, 10 June)
- Trying to help readability (Saturday, 9 June)
- user agent detection (Saturday, 9 June)
- Not clear whether web pages should use W3C technologies (Friday, 8 June)
- Should prohibit \"relies upon scripting\" (Friday, 8 June)
- No provision for link highlighting (Thursday, 7 June)
- Clarification of Text, image of text, and visually randered text (Wednesday, 6 June)
- Testing comment form (please ignore) (Wednesday, 6 June)
William Loughborough
~:'' γγγγ¨γγγγγΎγγγ
Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2007 18:52:39 UTC