- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:37:55 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Juan Ulloa Email: julloa@bcc.ctc.edu Affiliation: none, just a webmaster Document: W2 Item Number: Guideline 1.2: Provide synchronized alternatives for multimedia Part of Item: Comment Type: question Summary of Issue: Does video with synchronized captions fit into 1.2? Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): Would a Video file that was made accessible by adding synchronized captions (through something like SMIL) be considered multimedia? Judging by the definition of multimedia, I would think that is the case. Proposed Change: Add an exception in either the definition of Multimedia *or* in all the 1.2 requirements stating that video with synchronized audio for the purposes of making its audio accessible does not make the video a \"multimedia\" presentation.
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 16:38:11 UTC