W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > June 2007

Rationale for \"200%\" and 50%?

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:48:09 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070629164809.EB4B9BFD3@nelson.w3.org>


Name: Takayuki Watanabe, Masahiro Umegaki, Makoto Ueki
Email: nabe@lab.twcu.ac.jp
Affiliation: JIS Working Group(JSA INSTAC)
Document: UW
Item Number: Understanding Success Criterion 1.4.4
Part of Item: Intent
Comment Type: question
Summary of Issue: Rationale for \"200%\" and 50%?
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
We need more concrete reason/rationale on why \"200 percent\" and \"50 percent\" were chosen by the WCAG WG. Without the reason/rationale, we won\'t be able to determine if \"200 percent\" and \"50 percent\" can be applied to the Japanese characters.

Proposed Change:
Add more concrete rationale for why \"200%\" and \"50%\".
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 16:48:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:08 UTC