- From: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:10:26 +1000
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: <public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org>
---------------------------------------------------------- Comment 20: Source: http://www.w3.org/mid/000901c69538$2e394450$f4c9b23a@tkhcomputer (Issue ID: LC-1040) Vertical scoping - Vertical scoping outlaws saying "This site complies except for all movies and animations" but does not outlaw putting all movies and animations in a subdirectory (eg "movies") and scoping out that subdirectory (eg. Www.site.com/movies). It also doesn't outlaw a supermarket site saying "This site complies except for the shopping cart" or a bank web site saying "This site complies except for the internet banking section." Proposed Change: Remove the concept of vertical scoping. ---------------------------- Response from Working Group: ---------------------------- The "Scope out" language has now been removed from the Conformance section and conformance is now based on Web page(s): that is a primary resource referenced by a URI and any other resources that are rendered simultaneously with it with the understanding that different sub elements or resources may be rendered simultaneously with the primary resource at different points in time. The conformance claim process requires the claimant to state which URIs the claim applies to. We have also added a conformance criterion regarding pages that are part of a process: Complete processes: If a Web page that is part of a process does not conform at some level, then no conformance claim is made at that level for any Web pages in that process. ---------------------------- Response from GSW: ---------------------------- Thank you for taking my comment into account.
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 01:10:43 UTC