W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > June 2007

Apologetic whining in \"Sufficient Techniques\" explanation

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:29:06 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070629172906.9DB8547BA3@mojo.w3.org>


Name: Patrick H. Lauke
Email: redux@splintered.co.uk
Affiliation: 
Document: W2
Item Number: Important New Terms Used in WCAG 2.0
Part of Item: 
Comment Type: editorial
Summary of Issue: Apologetic whining in \"Sufficient Techniques\" explanation
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
Under \"Sufficient Techniques, 3rd para: \"The working group went through the effort to document...\"



To be harsh...booohooo. Is this aiming for sympathy?

Proposed Change:
\"The working group documented...\"
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 17:29:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:08 UTC