W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > June 2007

only 9 pages long

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:56:14 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070629165614.4522C6B63E@tibor.w3.org>


Name: Patrick H. Lauke
Email: redux@splintered.co.uk
Affiliation: 
Document: W2
Item Number: WCAG 2.0 Supporting Documents
Part of Item: 
Comment Type: editorial
Summary of Issue: only 9 pages long
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
1st bullet point: \"The actual guidelines ... are only 9 pages long\"

Proposed Change:
This sounds more like the document is trying to be apologetic and counter previous criticism. This belongs in the \"changes from previous WD\" document, not in the guidelines themselves.



Also, \"9 pages long\" is a vague term...depends on my print settings whether it\'s 9 pages or not. I\'d suggest just dropping that sentence altogether.
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 16:56:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:08 UTC