W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > June 2007

Why \"Documented lists\" needed?

From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:41:03 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Message-Id: <20070629164103.79FF1BFD3@nelson.w3.org>


Name: Takayuki Watanabe, Masahiro Umegaki, Makoto Ueki
Email: nabe@lab.twcu.ac.jp
Affiliation: JIS Working Group(JSA INSTAC)
Document: UW
Item Number: Understanding Conformance
Part of Item: Intent
Comment Type: question
Summary of Issue: Why \"Documented lists\" needed?
Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
In the section of \"Understanding Documented lists of Web technologies with Accessibility Support\", it reads \"There is no requirement in WCAG that a documented list be used or that technologies from such a list be used.\"



It is confusing because it can also be read as \"the authors don\'t need to refer and/or use the documented lists when choosing the technologies in order to conform to WCAG 2.0.\" Then the Documented lists of Web technologies with Accessibility Support won\'t be needed at all.



In the last paragraph within the same section, at the same time, it reads \"Authors, companies or others may wish to create and use their own lists of accessibility-supported technologies.\" This is the contradictory statements.

Proposed Change:
Add more clarification on what the documented lists are and for what they are needed.
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 16:41:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:08 UTC