- From: WCAG 2.0 Comment Form <nobody@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:09:13 +0000 (UTC)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
Name: Cynthia Shelly Email: cyns@microsoft.com Affiliation: Microsoft Document: W2 Item Number: Success Criterion 1.4.3 Part of Item: Comment Type: technical Summary of Issue: Should Icons be included in contrast requirements? Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): I know that we decided not to include diagram due to the difficulty of determining the correct contrast for varying line thicknesses and such. However, icons have a great role in determining usability of a site than general diagrams do. Proposed Change: Include icons in contrast requirements. Define \"icon\" and define what sufficient contrast would look like for an icon.
Received on Friday, 29 June 2007 01:09:14 UTC