w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from October to December 2003 by date

Monday, 29 December 2003

• Re: 508 Form fields question David Woolley

Tuesday, 30 December 2003

• Re: Screenreaders Access Systems
• Re: Screenreaders Mary.Dunlop@visionaustralia.org.au
• Re: Screenreaders tina@greytower.net
• Re: Screenreaders Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Screenreaders Access Systems
• Fw: [SEC508] Fw: 508 Form fields question David Poehlman

Monday, 29 December 2003

• Re: Screenreaders Charles McCathieNevile
• Screenreaders Erika Noll Webb
• RE: 508 Form fields question Derek Featherstone
• Fw: [SEC508] Fw: 508 Form fields question David Poehlman
• 508 Form fields question Beheler Kim

Sunday, 28 December 2003

• Re: Grey Text Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 27 December 2003

• RE: Grey Text Isabelle
• AW: Grey Text P.H.Lauke

Friday, 26 December 2003

• Re: Grey Text Geoff Deering

Thursday, 25 December 2003

• Re: Grey Text Joe Clark
• Re: How Far Can Web Accessibility Go? Geoff Deering
• RE: How Far Can Web Accessibility Go? keiko okada

Wednesday, 24 December 2003

• Re: Grey Text Geoff Deering
• Re: How Far Can Web Accessibility Go? Geoff Deering
• RE: Grey Text keiko okada
• Re: Grey Text David Murdoch
• Grey Text Isabelle
• RE: How Far Can Web Accessibility Go? keiko okada

Tuesday, 23 December 2003

• Re: How Far Can Web Accessibility Go? Geoff Deering

Monday, 22 December 2003

• Re: How Far Can Web Accessibility Go? David Poehlman
• How Far Can Web Accessibility Go? keiko okada

Sunday, 21 December 2003

• RE: the multi-coloured Google graphic on the W3C homepage.... Cheryl D. Wise
• Re: the multi-coloured Google graphic on the W3C homepage.... lynn alford
• Re: statistician needed: offtopic Nick Kew
• Re: statistician needed: offtopic Paul Hart
• Re: statistician needed: offtopic Jonathan Chetwynd

Saturday, 20 December 2003

• statistician needed: offtopic Jonathan Chetwynd
• the multi-coloured Google graphic on the W3C homepage.... Jonathan Chetwynd

Wednesday, 17 December 2003

• ATutor 1.3.1 Released info@atutor.ca
• Re: 'Birmingham Focus on Blindness' site wins award for accessibility Albrecht Marignoni
• Re: alt size can depend on the specific image (was: RE: Alt has to be short ...) tina@greytower.net
• Re: alt size can depend on the specific image (was: RE: Alt has to be short ...) Joe Clark
• alt size can depend on the specific image (was: RE: Alt has to be short ...) Jewett, Jim J
• 'Birmingham Focus on Blindness' site wins award for accessibility carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• RE: Alt has to be short ... P.H.Lauke
• Re: Alt has to be short ... Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 16 December 2003

• Re: Alt has to be short ... David Woolley
• Re: Question Regarding Citrix Web Interface and 508 Accessibility Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Alt has to be short ... yoan SIMONIAN
• RE: Alt has to be short ... Marjolein Katsma
• RE: Alt has to be short ... yoan SIMONIAN
• RE: Alt has to be short ... yoan SIMONIAN
• Re: Alt has to be short ... David Poehlman
• Re: Alt has to be short ... jon@hackcraft.net
• Alt has to be short ... yoan SIMONIAN
• RE: Accessible Survey Creation - Authoring Mechanism Mirabella, Mathew J

Monday, 15 December 2003

• Accessible Survey Creation - Authoring Mechanism Matthew Smith
• Re: Question Regarding Citrix Web Interface and 508 Accessibility Madeleine Rothberg
• Question Regarding Citrix Web Interface and 508 Accessibility Stallings Michael

Sunday, 14 December 2003

• Re: WAI Web Accessibility Best Practices Exchange Training, February 2004, Madrid Alan Chuter
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Toby A Inkster
• Fw: Design Science Awarded NSF Grant to Research Mathematics Accessibility David Poehlman

Saturday, 13 December 2003

• accessibility report on on-line newspapers in the UK Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: SVG DOM, event handling and how to disable? Jonathan Chetwynd

Friday, 12 December 2003

• Re: SVG DOM, event handling and how to disable? David Woolley
• Re: Emails for pwld David Woolley
• Re: E Training Accessibility Newspaper Article David Woolley
• summary of (RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft) Jewett, Jim J
• Re: WAI Web Accessibility Best Practices Exchange Training, February 2004, Madrid Charles McCathieNevile
• WAI Web Accessibility Best Practices Exchange Training, February 2004, Madrid Shawn Lawton Henry
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Derek Featherstone
• Re: Emails for pwld Andy Heath
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft jon@hackcraft.net
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: SVG DOM, event handling and how to disable? Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Emails for pwld David Poehlman
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft David Poehlman
• Re: Emails for pwld Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Emails for pwld Julian Voelcker
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Emails for pwld Matthew Smith
• Re: Emails for pwld Andy Heath
• RE: Emails for pwld John Colby
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Emails for pwld Caroline Lambie
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• E Training Accessibility Newspaper Article Ralph
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft John Colby
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft David Woolley
• Re: SVG DOM, event handling and how to disable? David Woolley

Thursday, 11 December 2003

• SVG DOM, event handling and how to disable? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility (Bobby: suggested improvements) Geoff Deering
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility Geoff Deering

Wednesday, 10 December 2003

• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility Geoff Deering
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility James Craig
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility Geoff Deering
• RE: Data Table question Juan Ulloa
• Re: Data Table question Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Data Table question James Craig
• Re: Data Table question Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility James Craig
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility Geoff Deering
• RE: Data Table question P.H.Lauke
• Re: The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Data Table question Charles McCathieNevile
• The Cult of Pseudo Accessibility Geoff Deering

Tuesday, 9 December 2003

• RE: "Simple Tool for Error Prioritization for Section 508 compliance" Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: "Simple Tool for Error Prioritization for Section 508 compliance" Phill Jenkins
• "Simple Tool for Error Prioritization for Section 508 compliance" William R Williams
• RE: Data Table question P.H.Lauke
• RE: Data Table question Juan Ulloa
• RE: Data Table question Juan Ulloa
• Re: Data Table question Beheler Kim
• RE: Data Table question P.H.Lauke
• Re: Data Table question Beheler Kim
• RE: Data Table question P.H.Lauke
• Data Table question Beheler Kim

Monday, 8 December 2003

• Accessibility 'Primer' Required Matthew Smith

Sunday, 7 December 2003

• Re: Unit of measure: 'peepo' was Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? David Woolley
• Unit of measure: 'peepo' was Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 5 December 2003

• Re: Date & number format David Woolley
• Re: [WAI-IG] Date & number format David Woolley
• Re: Date & number format David Woolley
• Re: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? David Woolley
• Position Announcement on Information Technology Accessibility at UIUC Jon Gunderson
• RE: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? P.H.Lauke
• RE: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? P.H.Lauke
• RE: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? Phill Jenkins
• Re: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? RUST Randal
• RE: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? RUST Randal
• Re: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? Andrew Kirkpatrick
• Re: Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? Phill Jenkins
• Remote Scripting -- Compliant with 508 and WCAG? RUST Randal
• RE: [WAI-IG] Date & number format Access Systems
• RE: [WAI-IG] Date & number format Cheryl D. Wise
• Re: [WAI-IG] Date & number format jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: [WAI-IG] Date & number format tina@greytower.net
• Re: [WAI-IG] Date & number format jon@hackcraft.net
• RE: [WAI-IG] Date & number format jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: [WAI-IG] Date & number format tina@greytower.net
• Re: [WAI-IG] Date & number format tina@greytower.net
• RE: [WAI-IG] Date & number format Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: [WAI-IG] Date & number format jon@hackcraft.net
• [WAI-IG] Date & number format Lois Wakeman
• Re: Date & number format tina@greytower.net
• Re: Date & number format jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Image replacement techniques fail with IE accessiblity settin gs Tom Croucher
• RE: Image replacement techniques fail with IE accessiblity settin gs Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Date & number format tina@greytower.net
• Re: Image replacement techniques fail with IE accessiblity settings Tom Croucher
• Re: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Date & number format jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Date & number format David Woolley

Thursday, 4 December 2003

• RE: Date & number format Gemayel, Ziad
• Re: Image replacement techniques fail with IE accessiblity settings David Woolley
• Re: Date & number format David Woolley
• Re: Declaration of the document Language David Woolley
• Re: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Kerstin Goldsmith
• Focus (was RE: Date & number format) Gemayel, Ziad
• Re: Date & number format Patrick Burke
• Re: Date & number format Access Systems
• Date & number format Gemayel, Ziad
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Juan Ulloa
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Access Systems
• Re: Declaration of the document Language jon@hackcraft.net
• Image replacement techniques fail with IE accessiblity settings Jon Dodd - Bunnyfoot
• Declaration of the document Language yoan SIMONIAN
• RE: Canadian French language websites study WAS [w3c-wai-ig] <non e> Posts
• Followup - CliffSays Robert B. Yonaitis
• New Government of Canada CLF Web Site Tester Dana Louise Simberkoff
• Open competition to publicise the WAI mission? Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: Canadian French language websites study WAS [w3c-wai-ig] <non e> Scarlett Julian (ED)

Wednesday, 3 December 2003

• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Jean-Marie D'Amour
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question tina@greytower.net
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question tina@greytower.net
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Access Systems
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Access Systems

Tuesday, 2 December 2003

• marking language Re: Tongue twister Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 3 December 2003

• RE: Tongue Twister Julian Vallis
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Harry Woodrow
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question David Woolley

Tuesday, 2 December 2003

• Re: Tongue twister David Woolley

Wednesday, 3 December 2003

• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Harry Woodrow
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Isabelle
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Paul Davis
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Paul Davis
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Paul Davis
• Real Player Alternative [Was: 20 minutes on Web Accessibility on Radio 4] James Craig

Tuesday, 2 December 2003

• RE: 20 minutes on Web Accessibility on Radio 4 P.H.Lauke
• Re: 20 minutes on Web Accessibility on Radio 4 Jonathan Chetwynd
• 20 minutes on Web Accessibility on Radio 4 Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Access Systems
• Re: Tongue twister tina@greytower.net
• RE: Tongue Twister Julian Vallis
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Julian Vallis
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Joe Clark
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Access Systems
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Julian Vallis
• Re: Tongue twister jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Tongue twister gez
• Re: www.paralympic.com (RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question) Access Systems
• Tongue twister Julian Vallis
• www.paralympic.com (RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question) P.H.Lauke
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question John Colby
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question yoan SIMONIAN
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question yoan SIMONIAN
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Julian Vallis
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Matt May
• Re: legal case Ryan air Access Systems
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question John Colby
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Paul Davis
• Re: legal case Ryan air Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: legal case Ryan air Paul Davis
• RE: legal case Ryan air jon@hackcraft.net
• RE: legal case Ryan air Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: legal case Ryan air Paul Davis
• Re: Web Accessibility Checker Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: legal case Ryan air Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Web Accessibility Checker Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: legal case Ryan air jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Paul Davis
• legal case Ryan air Paul Davis
• RE: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question John Colby
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Paul Davis
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Paul Davis
• A guide to using symbols on the internet Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Web Accessibility Checker Jael Kurtz
• Re: Web Accessibility Checker David Woolley
• Re: Web Accessibility Checker Nick Kew
• Re: Web Accessibility Checker Paul Bohman
• RE: Web Accessibility Checker Ralph
• Web Accessibility Checker Ralph

Monday, 1 December 2003

• French language list available Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive P.H.Lauke
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive John Colby
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Access Systems
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive John Colby
• RE: Southwest Airlines case Cynthia Waddell
• Re: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Byrne, Jim
• Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Ben Gilmore
• Re: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Byrne, Jim
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Harry Woodrow
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Byrne, Jim
• RE: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive John Colby
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question tina@greytower.net
• Re: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive tina@greytower.net
• Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive Pat Byrne
• Re: To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Joe Leech
• To be or not to be...an alt tag, that is the question Paul Davis
• RE: Southwest Airlines case Jim Thatcher

Sunday, 30 November 2003

• Southwest Airlines case Martin Sloan

Saturday, 29 November 2003

• Re: Web Accessibility Suite Access Systems
• Web Accessibility Suite Jonathan Chetwynd

Friday, 28 November 2003

• RE: CSS cursor hand Ben Darlow

Thursday, 27 November 2003

• attending talk Caroline Lambie
• Re: Web design for learning disability Jonathan Chetwynd
• RDIG call for papers deadline extended Marja-Riitta Koivunen

Wednesday, 26 November 2003

• Re: label tag and multiple associations James Craig
• RE: label tag and multiple associations Jim Thatcher

Thursday, 27 November 2003

• Re: Web design for learning disability Jael Kurtz

Wednesday, 26 November 2003

• Re: Web design for learning disability Julian Voelcker
• RE: Web design for learning disability BAYLISS, Andrew
• Re: Web design for learning disability Info at ATutor
• Web design for learning disability Caroline Lambie
• RE: label tag and multiple associations David Balch
• RE: label tag and multiple associations David Balch
• macromedia vs adobe @ alexa Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: label tag and multiple associations Charles McCathieNevile
• label tag and multiple associations Kieran_M_O'Brien@national.com.au

Tuesday, 25 November 2003

• Re: CSS cursor hand David Woolley
• longhorn - way off topic Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: SVG (was RE: webbyaward?) Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: SVG (was RE: webbyaward?) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: webbyaward? jon@hackcraft.net
• SVG (was RE: webbyaward?) P.H.Lauke
• Re: webbyaward? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: Marking up Meters Squared. David Woolley
• Re: CSS cursor hand David Woolley
• Re: Checkpoint 13.2 - metadata Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 24 November 2003

• Re: Marking up Meters Squared. David Woolley
• Re: Checkpoint 13.2 - metadata Matthew Smith
• Re: CSS cursor hand Marjolein Katsma
• RE: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Marking up Meters Squared. jon@hackcraft.net
• Checkpoint 13.2 - metadata michael.virant@dse.vic.gov.au
• CSS cursor hand Pablo Enríquez
• Re: webbyaward? jon@hackcraft.net

Sunday, 23 November 2003

• Re: "mouse or rat" Jonathan Chetwynd
• webbyaward? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: "mouse or rat" Marjolein Katsma
• Re: "mouse or rat" David Woolley
• Re: "mouse or rat" Julian
• RE: "mouse or rat" Angela K Hilton

Saturday, 22 November 2003

• RE: "mouse or rat" John Foliot - WATS.ca
• touchscreens or keyboard & mouse: offering a different functionality Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 David Woolley
• "mouse or rat" Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Access Systems
• Re: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 David Woolley
• Re: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 David Poehlman
• Re: default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 David Woolley
• Re: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Julian
• Re: default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Julian

Friday, 21 November 2003

• Re: Marking up Meters Squared. David Woolley
• Re: default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 David Woolley
• Re: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Bill LaPlant
• RE: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Access Systems
• RE: [W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 P.H.Lauke
• Re:[W3C] default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Access Systems
• Re: Fw: Creating Accessible Documents: A Live, Interactive, [VENDOR SPECIFIC] Online Web Conference David Poehlman
• RE: Marking up Meters Squared. John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Fw: Creating Accessible Documents: A Live, Interactive, [VENDOR SPECIFIC] Online Web Conference Julian
• Marking up Meters Squared. Tim Roberts
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects David Poehlman
• Fw: Creating Accessible Documents: A Live, Interactive, Online Web Conference David Poehlman
• RE: default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 David Poehlman
• default place holder for radio buttons- checkpoint 10.4 Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Design and accessiblity issues Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Design and accessiblity issues Access Systems
• Re: Design and accessiblity issues Matthew Smith
• Design and accessiblity issues Ben Gilmore
• RE: JavaScript Visual Effects P.H.Lauke
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects tina@greytower.net
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects gez
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects gez
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects David Poehlman

Thursday, 20 November 2003

• (forgot URL) RE: Update: HiSoftware Online tester and Cynthia Says Robert B. Yonaitis
• Update: HiSoftware Online tester and Cynthia Says Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects Joe Leech
• RE: JavaScript Visual Effects Juan Ulloa
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects William R Williams
• RE : RE : RE : link in new window debate Marjolein Katsma
• RE : RE : RE : link in new window debate yoan SIMONIAN
• RE: Accessible JScript calculators? P.H.Lauke
• Accessible JScript calculators? FOX, Jake
• RE: RE : link in new window debate P.H.Lauke
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects Lynn Stephens
• Re: link in new window debate David Woolley
• Re: JavaScript Visual Effects Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: width of dropdowns w3wai@puoli.net
• JavaScript Visual Effects Matthew Smith

Wednesday, 19 November 2003

• IT project SW London Paul Davis
• Re: RE : link in new window debate David Woolley
• Re: link in new window debate David Woolley
• Re: link in new window debate David Woolley
• Re: RE : RE : link in new window debate David Woolley
• Re: RE : link in new window debate tina@greytower.net
• Re: RE : link in new window debate Lynn Stephens
• RE: RE : link in new window debate Hy Cohen
• RE: RE : link in new window debate Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: RE : link in new window debate Paul Davis
• Re: width of dropdowns Jaz-Michael King
• RE : RE : link in new window debate Marjolein Katsma
• width of dropdowns WALKER, Julie
• Re: link in new window debate Phill Jenkins
• Re: link in new window debate David Poehlman
• Re: IT project- SW London Mental Health Jonathan Chetwynd
• RE: link in new window debate Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• RE: link in new window debate John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: RE : link in new window debate Info at ATutor
• RE: link in new window debate Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: link in new window debate Info at ATutor
• RE : RE : link in new window debate yoan SIMONIAN
• IT project- SW London Mental Health Paul Davis
• Re: Standards based, accessible HTML textarea editor? Julian Voelcker
• Re: Standards based, accessible HTML textarea editor? Julian Voelcker
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Julian Voelcker
• RE : link in new window debate Marjolein Katsma
• Standards based, accessible HTML textarea editor? Jim Byrne
• RE : link in new window debate yoan SIMONIAN
• RE: link in new window debate P.H.Lauke
• Re: link in new window debate Paul Davis
• Re: link in new window debate Tomas Caspers
• Re: Breadcrumb dividers (semantics and accessibility) David Woolley
• Re: link in new window debate tina@greytower.net
• Re: link in new window debate Paul Davis
• Re: "link in new window debate" Paul Davis
• Re: link in new window debate Access Systems
• Re: link in new window debate Info AT ATutor

Tuesday, 18 November 2003

• Re: "Special message to website creators" David Woolley
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? David Woolley
• Re: link in new window debate David Woolley
• Re: "Special message to website creators" David Woolley
• Re: "Special message to website creators" David Woolley
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? David Woolley
• RE: "link in new window debate" Jon Gibbins
• Re: link in new window debate Phill Jenkins
• Re: link in new window debate (was "Special message to website cr eators") Matthew Smith
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? David Woolley
• RE: "Special message to website creators" / RE: "link in new window debate" John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: link in new window debate John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: link in new window debate Info at ATutor
• Re: link in new window debate (was "Special message to website cr eators") Info at ATutor
• Re: link in new window debate (was "Special message to website cr eators") David Poehlman
• Re: link in new window debate (was "Special message to website cr eators") Info at ATutor
• Re: link in new window debate Access Systems
• Re: link in new window debate David Murdoch
• Re: link in new window debate Info at ATutor
• Re: link in new window debate Access Systems
• Re: link in new window debate Access Systems
• Re: link in new window debate Access Systems
• Re: link in new window debate David Murdoch
• Re: link in new window debate (was "Special message to website cr eators") David Poehlman
• Re: link in new window debate David Murdoch
• Re: link in new window debate Info at ATutor
• Re: link in new window debate Jon Gibbins
• RE: "Special message to website creators" Eileen O'Brien
• Re: "Special message to website creators" Jon Gibbins
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Access Systems
• Re: "Special message to website creators" Paul Davis
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? P.H.Lauke
• Re: link in new window debate (was "Special message to website cr eators") Info at ATutor
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Paul Davis
• RE: link in new window debate (was "Special message to website cr eators") Juan Ulloa
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Paul Davis
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Access Systems
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Access Systems
• re: "Special message to website creators" Phill Jenkins
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Julian Voelcker
• re: "Special message to website creators" Jon Gibbins
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? P.H.Lauke
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? P.H.Lauke
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Access Systems
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Paul Davis
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Paul Davis
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Julian Voelcker
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? P.H.Lauke
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Julian Voelcker
• Re: name in caps Lynn Stephens
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Julian Voelcker
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Julian Voelcker
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Julian Voelcker
• Re: accessibility qualifications tina@greytower.net
• Joceline Smith is out of the office Joceline.Smith@csplc.com
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Jim Thatcher

Monday, 17 November 2003

• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? LYNN STEPHENS
• Re: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Paul Davis
• name in caps LYNN STEPHENS
• re: "Special message to website creators" LYNN STEPHENS
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Juan Ulloa
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Gemayel, Ziad
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Juan Ulloa
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Juan Ulloa
• RE: Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Eileen O'Brien
• Using Frames - what problems do screen readers have? Julian Voelcker
• RE: Ouch!!! (was: RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal prot est) carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• RE: Ouch!!! (was: RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal prot est) carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• Re: "Special message to website creators" Jesper Tverskov
• Sidar 7th annual conference - a "report" Charles McCathieNevile
• OZeWAI conference - Dec 1-3, Melbourne Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: "Special message to website creators" Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: "Special message to website creators" Paul Davis
• Re: "Special message to website creators" Paul Davis

Sunday, 16 November 2003

• Re: accessibility qualifications phark@phark.net
• RE: "Special message to website creators" Isabelle
• FW: "Special message to website creators" Isabelle
• accessibility qualifications LYNN STEPHENS
• Re: "Special message to website creators" Paul Davis
• Re: "Special message to website creators" tina@greytower.net
• RE: "Special message to website creators" Isabelle
• "Special message to website creators" Joe Clark
• Re: Breadcrumb dividers (semantics and accessibility) Joe Clark

Saturday, 15 November 2003

• Re: Breadcrumb dividers (semantics and accessibility) tina@greytower.net
• Re: Breadcrumb dividers (semantics and accessibility) David Woolley
• Re: Breadcrumb dividers (semantics and accessibility) Mike Rundle

Friday, 14 November 2003

• Breadcrumb dividers (semantics and accessibility) James Craig
• ATutor 1.3 Released Info at ATutor
• media:Fw: Browser Plug-In Patent Reconsidered David Poehlman

Thursday, 13 November 2003

• request for help in checking Word doc Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: Redirection jon@hackcraft.net

Wednesday, 12 November 2003

• Re: Redirection David Woolley
• Re: Redirection David Woolley
• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest Nick Kew
• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest jon@hackcraft.net
• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest Liam McGee
• Re: [WAI_IG] Tooltips (was Nielsen's Latest ...) jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Redirection jon@hackcraft.net
• RE: [WAI_IG] Tooltips (was Nielsen's Latest ...) P.H.Lauke
• Re: Redirection jon@hackcraft.net
• [WAI_IG] Tooltips (was Nielsen's Latest ...) Lois Wakeman
• Re: Redirection David Woolley
• Re: Redirection David Woolley

Tuesday, 11 November 2003

• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest David Woolley

Wednesday, 12 November 2003

• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest Geoff Deering
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest David Poehlman
• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest Geoff Deering
• RE: Redirection P.H.Lauke
• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest Liam McGee
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest David Poehlman

Tuesday, 11 November 2003

• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest Liam McGee
• Re: Redirection Sue Young
• Re: Redirection David Woolley
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest David Woolley
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest tina@greytower.net
• Re: Redirection Matthew Smith
• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest (Grouped Controls) Geoff Deering
• Re: Redirection David Woolley
• Re: Ouch!!! (was: RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest) David Woolley
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest David Woolley
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest David Woolley
• Re: Ouch!!! (was: RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest) Phill Jenkins
• TinyURL (was RE: Redirection) P.H.Lauke
• Re: Redirection Matthew Smith
• Ouch!!! (was: RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest David Poehlman
• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest P.H.Lauke
• RE: Redirection P.H.Lauke
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest Jesper Tverskov
• RE: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• Re: Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest tina@greytower.net
• Nielsen's Latest Alertbox & a personal protest carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• Re: Redirection Nick Kew
• Re: Redirection David Woolley
• Re: Redirection Jesper Tverskov
• Re: Redirection Sue Young
• Redirection Matthew Smith

Monday, 10 November 2003

• RE: line length P.H.Lauke
• RE: line length Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• RE: line length P.H.Lauke
• Re: line length Jesper Tverskov
• Re: line length David Woolley

Sunday, 9 November 2003

• line length Kieran_M_O'Brien@national.com.au

Friday, 7 November 2003

• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Paul Davis
• Re: css validation confusion Bill Mason
• css validation confusion Scarlett Julian (ED)

Thursday, 6 November 2003

• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. David Woolley
• volunteers to test physics web site geoff freed
• New Working Draft: Inacessibility of Visually-Oriented Anti-Robot Tests: Problems and Alternatives Judy Brewer
• Re: Recommendations - Content Management System William R Williams
• RE: Access Database Renders Unrecognizable Characters John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Recommendations - Thanks Deirdre MacDermott
• RE: Access Database Renders Unrecognizable Characters Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Access Database Renders Unrecognizable Characters Laurie Davis-Covin
• RE: Recommendations - Content Management System Daniel O'Neil
• Re: Recommendations - Content Management System Julian Voelcker
• Re: Recommendations - Content Management System jon@hackcraft.net
• Re: Recommendations - Content Management System Jeremy Hurst
• Re: Recommendations - Content Management System Andy Heath
• RE: Recommendations - Content Management System P.H.Lauke
• Re: Recommendations - Content Management System Julian Voelcker
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Jim Byrne
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Paul Davis
• Re: Recommendations - Content Management System jon@hackcraft.net
• RE: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. P.H.Lauke
• Juicy Studio was Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. gez

Wednesday, 5 November 2003

• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Paul Davis
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. David Woolley
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. David Woolley
• Re: Recommendations - Content Management System David Woolley
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Alexander Johannesen
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. gez
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Paul Davis
• RE: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Ian Litterick
• Greytower was Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. gez
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Jim Byrne
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. tina@greytower.net
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Jim Byrne
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. gez
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. tina@greytower.net
• RE: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. P.H.Lauke
• Re: Fwd: In Their Shoes (background info) info
• Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. tina@greytower.net
• Recommendations - Content Management System Deirdre MacDermott
• User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. Jim Byrne
• Open Source Shopping Cart Software Geoff Deering

Tuesday, 4 November 2003

• RE: In Their Shoes (background info) Stephani Roberts Lincoln
• Fwd: In Their Shoes (background info) Stephani Roberts Lincoln
• Seeking students with disabilities Paul Bohman
• Re: Help for braille.css and aural.css Paul Davis

Monday, 3 November 2003

• Re: Help for braille.css and aural.css David Woolley
• Publication of my AT Book JMMAW@aol.com
• FW: read regular - typeface for dyslexics P.H.Lauke
• Re: Help for braille.css and aural.css Paul Davis
• Help for braille.css and aural.css informatica.gorizia@utgprefettura.it

Sunday, 2 November 2003

• plain english news feeds: ABC Jonathan Chetwynd

Saturday, 1 November 2003

• Re: media:Fw: Software offers vision-impaired access to MSU online courses Access Systems
• media:Fw: Software offers vision-impaired access to MSU online courses David Poehlman

Friday, 31 October 2003

• Possible additional CSS media type: 'reader' Joe Clark
• Re: accessible bulletin board required James Craig
• RE: accessible bulletin board required Jim Allan
• accessible bulletin board required Jonathan Chetwynd

Wednesday, 29 October 2003

• ANNOUNCEMENT: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard Version 1.0 for Microsoft Power Point Jon Gunderson
• Re: ATutor Feedback Request info

Tuesday, 28 October 2003

• ATutor Feedback Request info

Wednesday, 29 October 2003

• RE: radio button & drop-down Geoff Deering

Tuesday, 28 October 2003

• RE: radio button & drop-down Derek Featherstone
• RE: radio button & drop-down Geoff Deering
• Re: radio button & drop-down David Poehlman
• RE: radio button & drop-down Derek Featherstone

Monday, 27 October 2003

• Re: radio button & drop-down Kieran_M_O'Brien@national.com.au
• Testing of Site with Disabled Users Joe Clark
• Re: radio button & drop-down Matthew Smith
• radio button & drop-down Kieran_M_O'Brien@national.com.au
• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Ian Litterick

Sunday, 26 October 2003

• RE: UK Access Rules: Cynthia Waddell
• Re: another self reading site tina@greytower.net
• Re: NIH self-reading Web site David Woolley
• Re: NIH self-reading Web site David Poehlman
• Re: NIH self-reading Web site Ineke van der Maat
• another self reading site MGV
• Fw: NIH self-reading Web site David Poehlman

Saturday, 25 October 2003

• RE: Upper case selectors R.S.V.

Friday, 24 October 2003

• Re: Upper case selectors David Woolley
• Re: is this right? Cindy Sue
• Soliciting Feedback on Timed Text (TT) Authoring Format 1.0 Use Cases and Requirements Al Gilman
• Re:[W3C] triage, was, wanted: ecommerce examples Access Systems
• Re: is this right? Nick Kew
• Re: wanted: ecommerce examples Matt May
• Re:[W3C] wanted: ecommerce examples jon@hackcraft.net
• Re:[W3C] wanted: ecommerce examples Access Systems
• Re: Upper case selectors Matthew Smith
• Re: is this right? Cindy Sue
• Re: wanted: ecommerce examples Cindy Sue
• Re: Upper case selectors Bill Mason

Thursday, 23 October 2003

• Upper case selectors R.S.V.
• Re: UK Access Rules: Jonathan Chetwynd
• disabled peoples' contributions JMMAW@aol.com

Wednesday, 22 October 2003

• Re: display:none and visibility:hidden David Woolley
• Call for Papers: Teleconference on Making Visualizations of Complex Information Accessible for People with Disabilities Judy Brewer
• RE: Tables & Anchors Question Phill Jenkins
• RE: Tables & Anchors Question Joe Clark
• "Facts and Opinion About Fahrner Image Replacement" now online Joe Clark
• RE: Tables & Anchors Question P.H.Lauke
• RE: Tables & Anchors Question Geoff Deering
• Tables & Anchors Question Scott Rippon

Tuesday, 21 October 2003

• Media - Announcing Hi-Caption LE Robert B. Yonaitis

Monday, 20 October 2003

• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics info
• Re: Pictures of text or international characters? Re: [w3c-wai-ig] <none> David Woolley

Sunday, 19 October 2003

• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Pete Rainger - TechDis
• Re: UK Access Rules: a further point David Woolley
• Re: UK Access Rules: a further point Andy Heath
• Re: print-media type David Woolley
• Re: UK Access Rules: a further point David Woolley
• Re: wanted: ecommerce examples David Woolley

Saturday, 18 October 2003

• Re: UK Access Rules: Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 17 October 2003

• announcing:Fw: Learn about Federal Laws and Guidelines for Accessible Web Pages & Media David Poehlman
• RE: specialised fonts Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics info
• invitation to help update Policies ( was: RE: UK Access Rules:) Shawn Lawton Henry
• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Peter Rainger
• Re: specialised fonts (off topic) Lois Wakeman
• Re: specialised fonts Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Tom Croucher
• RE: specialised fonts Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Tim Roberts
• Re: specialised fonts Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Joe Clark
• RE: specialised fonts Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Joe Clark
• RE: wanted: ecommerce examples Geoff Deering
• Re: wanted: ecommerce examples Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: wanted: ecommerce examples Geoff Deering
• Re: Access to E-Books: Beyond the Text Project David Woolley

Thursday, 16 October 2003

• RE: UK Access Rules: Martin Sloan
• RE: UK Access Rules: Martin Sloan
• Re: UK Access Rules: David Woolley
• Re: specialised fonts Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Rachel Tanenhaus
• Thanks: New HiSoftware Online Tester Feedback Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: specialised fonts Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Access to E-Books: Beyond the Text Project geoff freed
• specialised fonts Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Jim Allan
• RE: UK Access Rules: Tom James
• RE: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Juan Ulloa
• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Access Systems
• Re:wanted e commerce examples Pat Byrne
• Re: wanted: ecommerce examples MGV
• RE: wanted: ecommerce examples Geoff Deering
• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Section 508.US
• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Peter Rainger
• RE: UK Access Rules: Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: UK Access Rules: Tom Croucher
• Re: UK Access Rules: Andy Heath
• RE: UK Access Rules: David Sloan
• Re: UK Access Rules: Tom Croucher
• RE: UK Access Rules: Section 508.US
• Re: UK Access Rules: Andy Heath
• Re: UK Access Rules: a further point Andy Heath
• RE: UK Access Rules: Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: UK Access Rules: Tom Croucher
• Re: UK Access Rules: Andy Heath
• RE: UK Access Rules: David Sloan
• Re: UK Access Rules: Tom Croucher
• RE: UK Access Rules: David Sloan
• UK Access Rules: Section 508.US
• UK Access rules WAS [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Scarlett Julian (ED)
• RE: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Alan Chuter
• Re: read regular - typeface for dyslexics Cindy Sue
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Section 508.US
• print-media type Kieran_M_O'Brien@national.com.au

Wednesday, 15 October 2003

• read regular - typeface for dyslexics P.H.Lauke
• Re: WAI Web site remarks and suggestions Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: WAI Web site remarks and suggestions Tom Croucher

Tuesday, 14 October 2003

• New Content Quality Tester on HiSoftware Robert B. Yonaitis
• Re: WAI Web site remarks and suggestions Jonathan Chetwynd
• C# SDK Two Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: Forms and Struts Question Jim Allan
• Forms and Struts Question Lubow Scott
• New C# Extension Kit for AccMonitor Robert B. Yonaitis
• Fw: ANNOUNCEMENT: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard Version 1.0 for Microsoft Power Point David Poehlman

Monday, 13 October 2003

• Re: WAI Web site remarks and suggestions Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: WAI Web site remarks and suggestions Tom Croucher
• Re: WAI Web site remarks and suggestions Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: WAI Web site remarks and suggestions Jonathan Chetwynd

Saturday, 11 October 2003

• RE: History and HTML authoring Re: portals Geoff Deering
• RE: portals Geoff Deering

Friday, 10 October 2003

• RDF in SVG was: www.commoncontent.org Jonathan Chetwynd
• French language accessibility list Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Accessible Audio Web Content P.H.Lauke
• wanted: ecommerce examples Shelley Boden
• Accessible Audio Web Content Matthew Smith
• RE: portals P.H.Lauke
• Action Item Kerstin Goldsmith

Thursday, 9 October 2003

• Re: portals Tom Croucher
• RE: portals (CMS Client Area Issues) Geoff Deering
• RE: portals Geoff Deering
• Re: portals Charles McCathieNevile
• History and HTML authoring Re: portals Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: portals Geoff Deering
• Re: portals David Woolley
• Re: portals Tom Croucher
• Re: portals Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: portals Geoff Deering

Wednesday, 8 October 2003

• Panther goes live 24th October, with native X11: plenty of usability quotes, couldn't find the accessibility ones..... Jonathan Chetwynd
• oops amke that CANCELLED Jonathan Chetwynd
• Where's the gilt edge? CANCALLED:Transform 2004: Assistive Technology and Inclusion: 10th July UMIST Manchester UK Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: portals Charles McCathieNevile
• portals FOX, Jake
• Fwd: Linux Accessibility -19 November 2003 - Birmingham Charles McCathieNevile
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Section 508.US
• Your contact info Katie Haritos-Shea

Tuesday, 7 October 2003

• Re: Skipper: Projects and Uses Matthew Smith
• Status of AT in America JMMAW@aol.com
• Re: accessible portal solutions Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: accessible portal solutions Tom Croucher
• accessible portal solutions Juan Ulloa
• Re: italic fonts Tom Croucher
• Re: Skipper: Projects and Uses Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: italic fonts Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: italic fonts Tom Croucher
• Skipper: Projects and Uses Geoff Deering
• Re: italic fonts David Poehlman
• Re: italic fonts Ineke van der Maat
• Re: italic fonts Tom Croucher
• RE: italic fonts Scarlett Julian (ED)
• Re: italic fonts jon@spin.ie
• Re: italic fonts Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: italic fonts jon@spin.ie
• italic fonts FOX, Jake
• Re: Blank alt attributes for images - best practise? Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 6 October 2003

• RE: Top of page carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• RE: Blank alt attributes for images - best practise? Matthew Ogston
• learn modern Greek, listen and read: free & online Jonathan Chetwynd
• Blank alt attributes for images - best practise? Dey Alexander
• Re: Top of page David Woolley
• Re: can someone shed some light on this? Jonathan Chetwynd
• Top of page Kieran_M_O'Brien@national.com.au

Saturday, 4 October 2003

• Re: can someone shed some light on this? David Poehlman
• Re: can someone shed some light on this? David Woolley
• Re: can someone shed some light on this? David Woolley
• Re: can someone shed some light on this? Matthew Smith
• can someone shed some light on this? David Poehlman

Friday, 3 October 2003

• Re: Old Age and Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: Internationalization (was [w3c-wai-ig] <none>) David Woolley
• Re: so, throw all those wonderfull navigation aids away! Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 2 October 2003

• so, throw all those wonderfull navigation aids away! David Poehlman
• Access Key Querks carl.myhill@ps.ge.com
• RE: Internationalization (was [w3c-wai-ig] <none>) Tom Croucher
• RE: Internationalization (was [w3c-wai-ig] <none>) P.H.Lauke

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• VII Annual Sidar Conference (Jornadas) - Lisbon, 3-5 November Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Internationalization (was [w3c-wai-ig] <none>) David Woolley
• Re: link rel David Woolley
• Re: Old Age and Accessibility David Woolley
• Re: link rel Julian
• Re: link rel William R Williams
• link rel Julian
• RE: Internationalization (was [w3c-wai-ig] <none>) jon@spin.ie
• RE: Internationalization (was [w3c-wai-ig] <none>) Tom Croucher
• RE: Internationalization (was [w3c-wai-ig] <none>) John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: Creating accessible forms with CGI Matthew Smith
• Creating accessible forms with CGI BAYLISS, Andrew

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 December 2003 13:03:22 UTC