- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:44:29 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
This is indeed an interesting question. I am inclined to say that it is too long. 60 characters is a lot to listen to under some circumstances but i can see where it might be necessary none the less. If I take alt as replacement and not description, I can usually shorten it. If it is standing in for a link, it might need to be 60 characters, but then, that is what link text is for. ----- Original Message ----- From: "yoan SIMONIAN" <yoan.simonian@snv.jussieu.fr> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:36 AM Subject: Alt has to be short ... ... but what means short ? We think short means 60 caracters. Do you think it's OK ? Does WAI made clearly a recommendation about that ? Thanks for your help. yoan SIMONIAN ###########o0°Association BrailleNet °0o ###### cellule accessibilité 9 Quai Saint-Bernard 75 252 PARIS Cedex 5 tel : 01 44 27 26 25 http://www.braillenet.org/accessibilite http://www.accessiweb.org ################################################
Received on Tuesday, 16 December 2003 09:44:45 UTC