- From: <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:00:02 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> It's a MUST NOT in RFC 2616 as far as caching ? URIs without explicit > expiry information: > > We note one exception to this rule: since some applications have > traditionally used GETs and HEADs with query URLs (those containing a > "?" in the rel_path part) to perform operations with significant side > effects, caches MUST NOT treat responses to such URIs as fresh unless > the server provides an explicit expiration time. This specifically > means that responses from HTTP/1.0 servers for such URIs SHOULD NOT be > taken from a cache. See section [41]9.1.1 for related information. > > <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec13.html#sec13.9> > I was two steps ahead of myself and assuming that everyone explicitly sets as much cache information as they can in their applications! A stupid assumption on my part. -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> *Thought provoking quote goes here*
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 05:00:05 UTC