- From: David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 22:40:18 +0100 (BST)
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> account of their disability. It's widely regarded as being applicable to web > sites, although the legislation itself doesn't mention the Web. No case law The government's guidance notes include a web site as an example, although the notes are not legally binding. However my understanding (from a lay point of view) is that it is the service provided by the web site, not the web site itself, that is covered, so the provision of a reasonably equivalent level of service through alternative means may be a valid defence (your call centre might have to be open on Christmas day, or you might have to close the web site down then!) I suspect that the legislation under which the Sydney Olympics prosecution was brought doesn't explicitly cover web sites, either.
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 17:41:47 UTC