- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:53:12 +0200
- To: <gdeering@acslink.net.au>
- Cc: "MGV" <tagi11@cox.net>, "Shelley Boden" <shelleyboden@enableuk.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Amazon has a version of their site that was apparently meant to be more useful from small portable devices - http://www.amazon.com/access - which was discussed on this list a while ago. It doesn't conform to anything as "advanced", as WCAG double-A. Despite meeting a couple of important priority 3 checkponts it misses some priority 2's and at least one p1, based on a 3-minute "quick check". But by stripping the site down to its bare essentials it is a huge improvement for a number of users. cheers Chaals On Friday, Oct 17, 2003, at 10:33 Europe/Zurich, Geoff Deering wrote: > I would expect that Shelley is looking for examples where the > accessibility component has been addresses as a primary concern in the > design. > > Geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: MGV > > I saw a post on another list that said the AMAZON.com site in the UK > was somewhat accessible. > -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundación Sidar charles@sidar.org http://www.sidar.org
Received on Friday, 17 October 2003 04:54:17 UTC