- From: Paul Davis <paul@ten-20.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:42:38 -0000
- To: <Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com>, <accessys@smart.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Why wouldn't a site that provides the same user interaction as a Netscape or IE browser and is readable by Jaws and W-E be considered accessible? it is accessible, technically, but the point was, who has the money to buy the software in the first place? certainly not many of the people we are attempting to reach. smiles Paul.
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2003 11:44:25 UTC