- From: Geoff Deering <gdeering@acslink.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:31:31 +1000
- To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: David Woolley The difficult area for portals or CMSs to address web standards and WAI i= I wonder if portal here really does mean CMSed page. My understanding of a portal is that it a central point for reaching resources all over the web, generally with the intent of collecting people to feed with advertisements. Yes, in a sense, portals and CMSs are two different things, even though portals may be driven by CMSs. > Anything beyond basic paragraphs with bold and italics and URLs, such as > lists and tables are very difficult for users to build without coding HTM= > L. The difficulty I always have with the CMS concept is that it is really an admission that HTML has failed to achieve one of its primary goals: to be an authoring language that ordinary users can use directly. In my understanding of the original web concept, a CMSed page would reduce to a list of links to the actual detail pages written by the information providers. CMSs are much more than that. They address and manage the whole publishing model; workflow, 3 tiered publishing (content, QA, production), etc, etc.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 18:51:55 UTC