Greytower was Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts.

Hi Tina,

I've changed the subject as it's gone off topic. I would love to give you
feedback on greytower.net, I'd prefer to do it off list if that's OK with
you? It will have to be tomorrow, as I'm running slightly behind on a tight
schedule.

If it's OK to contact you off list, let me know through gez@juicystudio.com

Best regards.

Gez
_____________________________
Supplement your vitamins
Web: http://www.juicystudio.com
Email: gez@juicystudio.com
Keeping developers informed!
----- Original Message -----
From: <tina@greytower.net>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side
scripts.


>
> On  5 Nov, gez wrote:
>
> >>   Firstly, it claims to serve text/html[*] -
> >>   I'm looking at the content-type here - but the DOCTYPE
> >>   claims XHTML 1.0 Strict and the *content* claims it is validated to
> >>   XHTML 1.1.
> >
> > I assume you've viewed the site with a non-XML user agent such as
Internet
> > Explorer? I can only deliver XHTML 1.1 with a MIME type of
>
>   You might have misunderstood my point. The content claims conformance
>   to another standard *despite* the content negotiation. May I suggest
>   changing that ?
>
>
>
>
> > application/xhtml+xml to XML compliant user agents. To the rest, I serve
> > XHTML 1.0 Strict with a MIME type of text/html. I'm not a huge fan of
> > content negotiation, but until user agents catch up, I have no choice.
>
>   Perhaps HTML 4.01 Strict would be an acceptable alternative.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>   Secondly, it claims WCAG 1.0 'AAA' - which, if nothing else, the link
> >>   texts should make clear it is not. When I look through the list of
> >>   links in my UA, I can make neither head nor tail out of "1".
> >
> > I aim for level "AAA", and claiming conformance provides feedback that
> > allows to me change things I've overlooked. You make a fair point about
> > using numbers for links, as they require the word page before them. I'll
> > update it. Thanks for your feedback
>
>   Perhaps "Archive" would be better.
>
>
>
>
>
> >>   I think we should all try to be examples. Please ?
> >
> > Like greytower.net? :-)
>
>   Did the mailing-list server clip off the bottom of my mail ? I'm
>   sorry. Are therer any feedback you'd like to give us for the ongoing
>   restoration project of greytower.net ?
>
>
> --
>  -    Tina Holmboe                    Greytower Technologies
>    tina@greytower.net                http://www.greytower.net/
>    [+46] 0708 557 905
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 10:10:43 UTC