- From: Matthew Smith <matt@kbc.net.au>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:18:40 +1030
- To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Greetings I have a situation where a number of documents were served from a database and generated 'on-the-fly'. These documents were all accessed from a single URI, with the query string selecting the document. To enable Google to index the material, the documents are being re-created as HTML documents rather than dynamic ones. The original URI will still provide the listings (and metadata), but the links will be to the new HTML documents. The problem, as I see it, is that calling the URI with the old 'display document' query string will no longer work since the document content will no longer be stored in the database. Would it be acceptable to send an HTTP 301 code from the programme to redirect the user agent to new document location (the HTML file)? I appreciate that the Guidelines don't like META element redirects, but what about this technique? I don't see how this could constitute an accessibility problem unless the user agent were unable to process a 301, but then is every UA fully aware of every HTTP code? Cheers M -- Matthew Smith Kadina Business Consultancy South Australia http://www.kbc.net.au
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2003 00:48:49 UTC