- From: gez <gez@juicystudio.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:55:55 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> Who wants to change browser settings every 5 mins, and if you design for the > lowest common denominator, who knows how to? and why should people have/want > to alter prefrences, just to see your site????? Cyberspace is a very lonely That's a very good point. It would be nice to get some usage statistics on the number of people that actually do change preferences either through their user agents, or through the features provided by content developers. > place at times, why put off visitors by forcing them to alter their computer > settings to see your site? We're not suggesting visitors should be forced to alter their settings. We're suggesting providing an additional means for visitors to alter their settings. Maybe there isn't a need for it, but I think it's an avenue worth exploring. > There is a danger of falling in love with the technicalities. It's just infatuation. Best regards. Gez _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins Web: http://www.juicystudio.com Email: gez@juicystudio.com Keeping developers informed! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Davis" <paul@ten-20.com> To: <tina@greytower.net>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 6:32 PM Subject: Re: User customization using a style sheet switcher and server side scripts. > > In my days in the sales business, we used to have the K.I.S.S. principle. > > Who wants to change browser settings every 5 mins, and if you design for the > lowest common denominator, who knows how to? and why should people have/want > to alter prefrences, just to see your site????? Cyberspace is a very lonely > place at times, why put off visitors by forcing them to alter their computer > settings to see your site? > > Butts, aligators and swamps tend to lose original objectives. You may be > working on state of the art hardware, but according to site stats I was > looking at last week I still have visitors using win95 and I.E.4/netscape 3. > > There is a danger of falling in love with the technicalities. > > smiles > Paul Davis > > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:56:17 UTC