Tuesday, 31 July 2001
Monday, 30 July 2001
- Re: Proposal: add a terminology document to the M&S
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- RE: Proposal: add a terminology document to the M&S
- RE: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: updated draft of model theory
- Re: RDF Schema discussion for F2F day 2: domain/range notes, model theory
Sunday, 29 July 2001
- RE: Proposal: add a terminology document to the M&S
- RE: Proposal: add a terminology document to the M&S
- Re: updated draft of model theory
- Re: Proposal: add a terminology document to the M&S
- What is assumed?
- Re: RDF Schema discussion for F2F day 2: domain/range notes, model theory
- Re: Proposal: add a terminology document to the M&S
Saturday, 28 July 2001
- Proposal: add a terminology document to the M&S
- Proposal: RDF Processor definition
- RDF Schema discussion for F2F day 2: domain/range notes, model theory
Friday, 27 July 2001
- updated draft of model theory
- f2f regrets
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- ACTION: literals in M&S
- [Fwd: anon resources and rdf:parseType='daml:collection']
- Application Experience with MusicBrainz
- Re: Revised model theory
- Re: action: some references to model theory
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- DAML+OIL Required Changes to RDF(S)
Thursday, 26 July 2001
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives:RETRACTION
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Revised model theory , small correction.
- Re: updated strawman model theory
- Re: updated strawman model theory
- Re: N-Triples V1.6 Character Encoding and Escaping
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives
- Re: F2F Page Updated
- apologies
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: F2F Page Updated
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Revised model theory
- Re: updated strawman model theory
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: RDFCore Telcon Agenda 2001-07-27 - regrets
- RDFCore Telcon Agenda 2001-07-27
- Re: updated strawman model theory
- Re: updated strawman model theory
Wednesday, 25 July 2001
- Re: N-Triples V1.6 Character Encoding and Escaping
- Re: rdfms-xmllang: a proposal
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: Implementing "aboutEach" (ACTION JUN-01-01-#9)
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Re: weekly call for agenda items
- Re: RDF Core WG test cases area
- Re: N-Triples V1.6 Character Encoding and Escaping
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- test
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- N-Triples V1.7
- N-Triples V1.6 Character Encoding and Escaping
- weekly call for agenda items
- Re: F2F Page Updated
- Re: N-Triples: Naming anonnodes
- Re: N-Triples: Naming anonnodes
- Re: F2F Page Updated
- Re: Minutes: July 20, 2001 teleconf
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
Tuesday, 24 July 2001
- F2F Page Updated
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: updated strawman model theory [semi-humor]
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: updated strawman model theory [semi-humor]
- Re: updated strawman model theory [semi-humor]
- Re: updated strawman model theory [semi-humor]
- Action: RDF(S) and DAML+OIL Coordination paper
- Re: updated strawman model theory [semi-humor]
- updated strawman model theory
- N-Triples V1.6
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: N-Triples: Naming anonnodes
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: N-triples (1.4)
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: Implementing "aboutEach" (ACTION JUN-01-01-#9)
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: N-triples (1.4)
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- xml:lang (non-)use-cases
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: rdfms-xmllang: a proposal
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: N-Triples: Naming anonnodes
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: N-triples (1.4)
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Discussion: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Model theory, abstract syntax
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- Re: Model theory, abstract syntax
Monday, 23 July 2001
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: rdfms-xmllang: a proposal
- Re: N-Triples: Naming anonnodes
- Re: rdfms-xmllang: a proposal
- Re: N-Triples: Naming anonnodes
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Model Theory, sets of statements and anon resources
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- Re: rdfms-xmllang: a proposal
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- rdfms-xmllang: a proposal
- Re: RDF Core WG test cases area
- Jigedit administrivia
- Re: RDF Core WG test cases area
- Re: Minutes: July 20, 2001 teleconf
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- Re: Strawman Model Theory
- Model Theory, sets of statements and anon resources
- Strawman Model Theory
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Re: #rdfms-uri-substructure
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
Sunday, 22 July 2001
Friday, 20 July 2001
- RDF/XML Syntax Grammar Experiments
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: RDFCore F2F Registration - Urgent
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: N-triples (1.5)
- Re: #rdfms-uri-substructure
- #rdfms-uri-substructure
- Re: action: some references to model theory
- Action: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources questions
- Minutes: July 20, 2001 teleconf
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- action: some references to model theory
- RDFCore F2F Registration - Urgent
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- #rdfms-identity-anon-resources: provenance
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
Thursday, 19 July 2001
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: N-triples (1.5)
- Implementing "aboutEach" (ACTION JUN-01-01-#9)
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- N-triples (1.5)
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: N-triples (1.4)
- Re: N-triples (1.4)
- RDFCore Telecon 2001-07-20 Agenda
- Re: Updated RDFCore 13Jul Minutes
- what does m&s say about anon resources
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
Wednesday, 18 July 2001
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: RDF Core WG test cases area
- Re: Updated RDFCore 13Jul Minutes
- Re: N-triples (1.4)
- RDF Core WG test cases area
- Re: N-triples (1.4)
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- N-triples (1.4)
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: F2F Page and Agenda
- Re: Discussion: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Updated RDFCore 13Jul Minutes
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: Updated RDFCore 13Jul Minutes
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- regrets
- Re: action: choices for anonymous resources
- Re: action: choices for anonymous resources
- Re: action: choices for anonymous resources
- weekly call for telecon agenda items
Tuesday, 17 July 2001
- action: choices for anonymous resources
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: F2F Page and Agenda
- Re: Face to Face 1/2 Aug Registration
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: Model theory, abstract syntax
- Re: A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-xmllang alternatives
Monday, 16 July 2001
- Updated RDFCore 13Jul Minutes
- rdfms-xmllang alternatives
- Re: Face to Face 1/2 Aug Registration
- Model theory, abstract syntax
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- rdfms-xmllang use case
- A use case for anon nodes - action from telecon
- Re: F2F Page and Agenda
- F2F Page and Agenda
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Review of minutes 13-Jul-2001
- Re: Face to Face 1/2 Aug Registration
- Review of minutes 13-Jul-2001
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- Re: new issue from rdf-interest
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- Re: RDFCore 13Jul minutes: container resolution
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Face to Face 1/2 Aug Registration
- Re: RDFCore 13Jul minutes: anon-resources, xmllang, terminology, model theory
- Re: Face to Face 1/2 Aug Registration
- Re: Face to Face 1/2 Aug Registration
- Face to Face 1/2 Aug Registration
- Re: Coordination points between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL
- Coordination points between RDF(S) and DAML+OIL
- regrets
- Re: RDFCore 13Jul minutes: anon-resources, xmllang, terminology, model theory
- Re: N-Triples test cases
- RE: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
Sunday, 15 July 2001
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
- RE: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
- Re: new issue from rdf-interest
- Re: new issue from rdf-interest
Saturday, 14 July 2001
Friday, 13 July 2001
- Re: #rdfms-xmllang - summary
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
- Re: RDFCore 13Jul minutes
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: RDFCore 13Jul minutes
- Re: RDFCore 13Jul minutes: anon-resources, xmllang, terminology, model theory
- Re: RDFCore 13Jul minutes
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- RDFCore 13Jul minutes: anon-resources, xmllang, terminology, model theory
- Important Issue: rdfms-fragments
- belated regrets
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: Terminology Help Needed
- Re: N-Triples test cases
- N-Triples test cases
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
Thursday, 12 July 2001
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Feedback: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- RE: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Terminology Help Needed (was: Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?)
- Re: Feedback: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- #rdfms-xmllang - summary
- Feedback: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: RDFCore Telecon 2001-07-13 Agenda
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- Re: RDFCore Telecon 2001-07-13 Agenda
- RE: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
- Re: RDFCore Telecon 2001-07-13 Agenda
- RDFCore Telecon 2001-07-13 Agenda
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- RE: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Yes, it is
- xml:lang on literals.
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Yes, it is
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: rdfms-xmllang: Strawman Proposal
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
- RE: #rdfms-xmllang
- RE: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
- rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Why?
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
Wednesday, 11 July 2001
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: rdfms-xmllang: Strawman Proposal
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Yes, it is
- rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure: Yes, it is
- rdfms-graph: Food for thought
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- Re: Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: #rdfms-xmllang
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Proposal: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
- rdfms-xmllang: Strawman Proposal
- Re: #rdfms-xmllang
- Re: #rdfms-xmllang
- Re: #rdfms-xmllang
- weekly call for agenda items for the telecon
- RE: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: #rdfms-xmllang
- Re: Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
Tuesday, 10 July 2001
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: literals as resources / completion of ACTION 2001-07-06 (dependencies)
- Re: literals as resources / completion of ACTION 2001-07-06 (dependencies)
- Re: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
- RE: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
- RE: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
Monday, 9 July 2001
- Re: Discussion: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
- Re: N-Triples
- Re: N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
- Re: N-Triples
Sunday, 8 July 2001
- Re: Discussion: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: more about rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about
- rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about Wording Change
- N-Triples Updated 2001-07-08
- RDFCore minutes 2001-07-06 (for review)
Friday, 6 July 2001
Saturday, 7 July 2001
Friday, 6 July 2001
- RE: literals as resources / completion of ACTION 2001-07-06 (dependencies)
- RE: literals as resources
- Re: literals as resources / completion of ACTION 2001-07-06 (dependencies)
- Re: literals as resources / completion of ACTION 2001-07-06 (dependencies)
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- RE: literals as resources / completion of ACTION 2001-07-06 (dependencies)
- RE: literals as resources
- Re: literals as resources / completion of ACTION 2001-07-06 (dependencies)
- literals as resources
- apologies
- rdf-containers-formalmodel: proposed edits to M+S spec
- An example of use cases and requirements for supporting language in RDF
- RE: N-Triples
- Re: N-Triples
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- RDF clarification versus RDF V2. Was: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Priorities for F2F (completion of ACTION: 2001-06-22#4)
Thursday, 5 July 2001
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- N-Triples
- Re: more about rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- [Fwd: rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about]
- Re: more about rdfms-difference-between-ID-and-about
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Discussion: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- RDFCore Telecon 2001-07-06 Agenda
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- RE: Literals as Resources (was RE: draft partitioning of the issues)
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- RE: Literals as Resources (was RE: draft partitioning of the issues)
- Re: Literals as Resources (was RE: draft partitioning of the issues)
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
Wednesday, 4 July 2001
Tuesday, 3 July 2001
- Re: log:forSome/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: nature of anon resource [was Re: log:forSome]
- Re: log:forSome/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: log:forSome/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- Re: query and unification
- RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?
- query and unification
- RE: Literals as Resources (was RE: draft partitioning of the issues)
- Re: ISSUE: #rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?