RE: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope?

:At 02:37 PM 7/5/01 +0100, Bill de hÓra wrote:
:>We should consider having a futures document, detailing issues
:>identified as relevant but out of scope for this iteration.
:
:We do (or, a section of a document):
:
:   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#futures
:

Ahh...missed that, thanks Graham. So if this Literals issue
gets voted out of scope, I'd like to see it placed there.

Bill

----
Bill de hÓra  :  InterX  :  bdehora@interx.com

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2001 10:32:15 UTC