- From: Bill de hÓra <bdehora@interx.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:45:23 +0100
- To: "rdf core" <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Pushing aside resource mumbo jumbo (red herrings). To me, it comes down to these 3 questions: 1: Feasibility: can we give RDF Literals URIs in the M&S and stay within the charter? 2: Validity: should we give RDF Literals URIs in the M&S? 3: Purpose: if we did give RDF Literals URIs, what are we using the RDF to describe? (it's not at all clear to me) Bill --- Bill de hÓra : InterX : bdehora@interx.com :-----Original Message----- :From: Aaron Swartz [mailto:me@aaronsw.com] :Sent: 05 July 2001 23:24 :To: Brian McBride :Cc: Ron Daniel; rdf core :Subject: Re: #rdfms-literals-as-resources in scope? [...]
Received on Friday, 6 July 2001 04:46:22 UTC